My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
08/28/12
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2010's
>
2012
>
08/28/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 11:15:32 AM
Creation date
10/29/2012 1:53:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Document Date
08/28/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Backous agreed the streetscape should not have been installed, but it was. He <br />stated he has no problem with the suggested policy but this situation should have been <br />anticipated by the Development Manager. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated the City is responsible for building infrastructure and some residents <br />have thanked the City for installing the streetscape because it gives a sense of completeness. He <br />clarified the costs to make repairs are covered from contractors and the issue is whether the <br />streetscape should be repaired or replaced. <br />Commissioner Tossey stated streetscape damage was anticipated because a policy is in place that <br />requires Flaherty & Collins to make repairs. He stated if colored concrete is an option, it should <br />be considered because it may be the cheapest alternative to address appearance. <br />The consensus of the HRA was to direct staff to draft a policy, as discussed, to hold a <br />preconstruction evaluation to review the project and potential streetscape impacts. Following <br />construction, a second evaluation of the portions damaged during construction will occur to <br />determine the contractor's obligation to restore and the Development Team will make <br />recommendations to the HRA on a case -by -case basis. <br />5.05: Review Sign Package and Design Framework Modifications <br />Commissioner Wise stated he will not participate in this discussion or vote as he is the owner of <br />one of the properties under discussion <br />Development Manager Lazan reviewed the staff report and explained that one sign panel would <br />be designated to the three lots. If there are multi- tenants, Mr. Wise would have to allocate use of <br />the panel. He explained the intent of this agenda item is to approve a contribution to the <br />planning budget so staff can start the effort of looking at locations throughout The COR, costs, <br />scale, etc. The intent is not to develop a master sign appendix but to refine that information and <br />solve the issues for these three lots. It is proposed that the users of the three lots each pay one- <br />third of the capital costs and maintain their sign box. The HRA will maintain the streetscape and <br />plantings. It was noted the capital purchase is incorporated into the real estate purchase. <br />The HRA discussed the proposal and asked questions of Development Manager Lazan. <br />Development Manager Lazan stated there is about $8,000 to address all sign issues but he is <br />requesting $10,000 so funds are available for Development Services Manager Gladhill to <br />collaborate as well. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated his intent to abstain on this item as he is ambivalent to this right now. <br />Motion by Commissioner Ramsey, seconded by Commissioner Backous to approve the <br />contribution of $10,000 to the Professional Services Budget and direct staff to prepare necessary <br />amendments to the Design Framework. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / August 28, 2012 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.