My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2012
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:11:01 AM
Creation date
10/31/2012 4:17:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/03/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
existing stockpile of soil. After the material is processed, it would be stockpiled on the other side of the soil <br />stockpile and would also be confined to an area ninety (90) feet wide by 200 feet deep. The existing soil stockpile <br />appears to have been approved as part of the original site plan for the property in 2001. The current site plan <br />indicates that both the demolition concrete and asphalt stockpile and the stockpile of processed concrete and asphalt <br />would be limited to a height of fourteen (14) feet. The total area of the three (3) stockpiles would be <br />approximately one and a half (1.5) acres. <br />There are some existing, mature deciduous trees scattered along the eastern boundary and some young evergreen <br />trees along that same boundary as well as south of the stockpile areas. The applicant has also indicated that twelve <br />(12) new evergreens would be installed along the western boundary. No screening is proposed along the northern <br />property line. None of the existing or proposed evergreens have reached maturity and therefore, provide only <br />limited screening of the stockpiles. <br />Staff has contacted the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) regarding this proposed use and was informed <br />that no solid waste permit through the state would be required because, as outlined in MN Rules 7035.2860, there is <br />a Standing Beneficial Use Determination for uncontaminated crushed concrete used as a substitute for conventional <br />aggregate. However, monitoring the material for contaminated concrete and/or asphalt, such as concrete with lead <br />based paint, would be the responsibility of the City and/or County or both. Other permits may also be required, <br />such as a Nonmetallic Mining and Associated Activities permit through the state. Staff has instructed the applicant <br />to contact the MPCA directly to determine what, if any, additional permits are necessary for the concrete/asphalt <br />crushing operation. <br />14191 Ebony St NW <br />Sauter and Sons, Inc., is utilizing this vacant parcel, which they own, for stockpiling of soil. There are multiple <br />piles of soil on this property. Since this is a vacant parcel, the outside storage would be considered the primary use <br />of the property. While the property is zoned PUD, the underlying zoning would be E-2 Employment District and <br />within this zoning district, open and outside storage as a principal use requires a conditional use permit. <br />Stockpiling of soil on this vacant parcel, with certain conditions in place, may be a reasonable use of the <br />property. Again, the owner of the parcel is in the excavation business and this property is directly adjacent to <br />headquarters for Sauter and Sons, Inc. The main concern with this use would be erosion control to prevent <br />sediment from entering the retention pond and storm sewer system. If this use is approved, it would incorporate a <br />site plan showing location and size of stockpiles and any expansion, whether it be a building or additional <br />stockpiles, would require an amendment to the conditional use permit. <br />Funding Source: <br />The Applicant is responsible for all City costs incurred in administering and enforcing this Permit. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Over the past ten to fifteen (10-15) years, the City has expended approximately $2.3 million on land acquisition, <br />public improvements, site improvements and demolition costs to eliminate blighted conditions in this area as part of <br />the development of Gateway North Industrial Park No. 5. In 2003, this same request for processing demolition <br />concrete was considered by the Planning Commission and due to several concerns, including the investment made <br />in redeveloping this area, lack of adequate screening, uncertainty of environmental aspects associated with the <br />demolition materials and the activity not being compatible with development in the industrial park, was <br />recommended for denial. However, within the vicinity of the subject property are two similar uses, both operating <br />with conditional use permits, and both include stockpiling and processing materials. If sufficient conditions <br />are included in the permit, which may also include erosion control measures for the stockpiles and possibly berming <br />along the western property boundary for screening purposes, this general area may be a logical fit for this type of <br />use. The Applicant shall be required to submit a drainage, grading, and erosion control plan to ensure that the <br />regional stormwater system is not negatively impacted by the proposed use. <br />Given the nature of the use and concerns raised with the previous review for this same use, the Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.