Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, <br />Peterson and Cich. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember DeLuca and seconded by Councilmember Pearson to introduce <br />Ordinance #89-2 rezoning Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Bulow's Addition from B-1 Business <br />to R-1U Residential. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, <br />Peterson and Cich. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />See page 9 for further action. <br /> <br />Council recessed at 9:06 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann called the meeting back to order at 9:22 p.m. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Request To Rezone Lots 2 And 3, Block 1, Bulow's Addition <br />From B-1 Business To R-lU Residential; Case Of Mr. Arthur <br />Bulow: <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich referred to Council's action, just prior to recess, to introduce an ordinance <br />to rezone certain lots in Bulow's Addition; noted that the ordinance to rezone the lots had <br />been introduced at a previous meeting; recommended adoption of the ordinance at this <br />time. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember DeLuca and seconded by Councilmember Pearson to adopt <br />Ordinance #89-2 rezoning Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Bulow's Addition, from B-1 Business <br />to R~IU Residential. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, <br />Peterson and Cich. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #5: Discuss Park Dedication: <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley recalled that Mr. Gobernatz' recent minor subdivision has raised a question <br />regarding whether or not park dedication requirements should be placed on <br />resubdivisions. Interpretation of the ordinance allows for park dedication requirements <br />on resubdivision. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto stated that he has researched the issue with other communities and virtually all <br />of them require park dedication only on the new lot being created or constructed on. The <br />ways in which the remainder of the property is handled varies; Champlin addresses the <br />issue when it comes up for resubdMsion; Andover does not allow further resubdivisions <br />for 3 years unless the developer submits a full plat; Ham Lake does not require park <br />dedication on minor subdivisions; Eagan operates on the philosophy that once park land <br />dedication is paid, it is satisified and not required on subsequent resubdivision. Mr. Otto <br /> <br />City Council/January 24, 1989 <br /> Page 9 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />