Laserfiche WebLink
Council recessed at 9:02 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann called the meeting back to order at 9:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLuca resumed discussion of funding the Fire Department and stated that <br />he is opposed to continuing to fund the entire department from the Landf'fll Trust Fund and <br />feels that the cost should be shifted to the residents. <br /> <br />Sandra Ashley stated that the decision was to only fund contracted fire protection services <br />from the Landfill Trust Fund; other department costs will be turned over to the residents; in <br />1991 there will no longer be a need to contract for fhe protection services and at that point <br />the residents will be paying the entire cost of a fh:e department. <br /> <br />Council consensus was that Mr. Hartley should draft a resolution establishing guidelines <br />and criteria for use of the Landfill Trust Fund to allow spending the interest and also the <br />principle, but only in certain situations and on a payback basis. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember DeLuca to adopt <br />Resolution #89-09-248 adopting the Property Tax Levy. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers DeLuca, Pearson, Cich <br />and Peterson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peterson initiated a discussion regarding the Airport Commission's request <br />for $30,000 for airport related activities, $20,000 of which would be recaptured from other <br />agencies. <br /> <br />Mr. Ippel stated that the funding is to follow through with tasks remaining relating to the <br />Airport Master Plan Study and the pre-application for AIP funding. Mr. Ippel reported that <br />Mn/DOT and FAA have reached a finding of no significant impact with respect to the <br />environmental assessment worksheet on proposed improvements at Gateway. Because of <br />the level of required, the FAA District Office is capable of making a judgment with respect <br />to funding. It is probable that the funding would be approved with contingencies. Those <br />contingencies would include a commitment from Ramsey that no more landfills will be <br />sited within 5,000 feet of the runway and that funding would not be available until there are <br />agreements made regarding the closure date for the existing landfill. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peterson suggested that the Airport Commission's request for $30,000 not <br />be funded at this time because it is questionable whether the airport should exist and <br />because the reports generated with the $30,000 may be outdated by the time funding is <br />available because the expected life of the landfill is another 3-4 years. <br /> <br />Mr. Ippel stated that even though the Metropolitan Airport Commission is not interested in <br />owning any more airports, it recognizes that Gateway could serve the entire region and is <br />discussing budgeting to assist Ramsey with it's share of the development costs, either in <br />whole or in part. The City is to the point now where it has been determined that the airport <br />improvements are technically feasible and they qualify for funding participation. The City <br />should follow through with the pre-application for funding and determine when funding <br />might be available. <br /> <br />City Council/September 21, 1989 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />