My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/13/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 11/13/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:25:35 PM
Creation date
11/14/2012 1:55:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/13/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
638
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
amount of attention required to read roadside advertisements could lead to driving <br />errors that could cause crashes. <br />"The enormous flexibility of display possessed by CEVMS <br />makes it possible to use them in ways that can attract <br />drivers' attention at greater distances, hold their attention <br />longer, and deliver a wider variety of information and <br />image stimuli than is possible by the use of conventional <br />advertising signs." <br />Texas Transportation Institute for FHWA, Impacts of Using Dynamic Features to <br />Display Messages on Changeable Message Signs (Dudek et al., 2005)12 <br />This study examined the comprehension times for three different scenarios for <br />DOT -operated changeable message signs. The scenarios evaluated were: <br />• Flashing an entire one -phase message <br />• Flashing one line of a one -phase message while two other lines of the message remain <br />constant <br />• Alternating text on one line of a three -line CMS while keeping the other two lines of <br />text constant on the second phase of the message <br />The findings of this study were: <br />• Flashing messages did not produce faster reading times. <br />• Flashing messages may have an adverse effect on message comprehension for <br />unfamiliar drivers. <br />• Average reading times for flashing line messages and two-phase messages were <br />significantly longer than for alternating messages. <br />• Message comprehension was negatively affected by flashing line messages. <br />While this research did not evaluate advertising -related signs, it does demonstrate that <br />flashing signs require more of the driver's time and attention to comprehend the message. <br />In the case of electronic billboards, this suggests that billboards that flash may require <br />more time and attention to read than static ones. <br />3.3.1 OTHER INFORMATION <br />NHTSA Driver Distraction Internet Forum (2000) 13 <br />The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration held an internet forum to gather <br />research and public comment related to driver distraction with an emphasis on the use of <br />cell phones, navigation systems, wireless Internet and other in -vehicle devices. During <br />this forum, participants were invited to take a poll to determine the most prominent driver <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.