My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/13/2012
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2012
>
Agenda - Council - 11/13/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 12:25:35 PM
Creation date
11/14/2012 1:55:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/13/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
638
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
distraction issues. Electronic billboards were identified as one of six noted sources of <br />distraction. <br />Parliament of Victoria, Australia, Report of the Road Safety Committee on the <br />Inquiry into Driver Distraction (2006)14 <br />This report identified road signs and advertising as one of the largest sources of driver <br />distraction. At least three billboards near Melbourne, Australia display moving images. <br />"The Committee considers these screens to be at the high <br />end of potential visual distraction and accordingly, present <br />a risk to drivers." <br />The study also included a quote from the Manager of the Road User Behaviour group at <br />VicRoads (the State's road and traffic authority) from a December 2005 hearing: <br />What we do know is when there is movement involved, such <br />as flicker or movement in the visual periphery, that this is <br />more likely to capture a driver's attention. We actually are <br />hard -wired as human beings to movement, so particularly <br />moving screens and information that scrolls at <br />intersections and in highly complex driving situations <br />these are risky, and in particular researchers have been <br />most concerned about those sort of advertising materials. <br />This opinion would suggest that electronic signs can present a distraction to drivers. <br />3.4 How Much Distraction Is a Problem? <br />A number of studies were identified that discussed concerns with driver distraction generally. It <br />should be noted that some of the studies cited use specific crash data that is ten or more years <br />old. Direct comparison of distraction sources to influences of today may not be completely valid <br />due to increased technological sophistication of distracting influences. These could include in - <br />vehicle technology (e.g., navigation systems, MP3 players, DVD players, CD players, computer <br />systems, etc.) as well as other potentially distracting influences (e.g., cell phones, text messaging, <br />dynamic signage, other roadway elements, etc.) that were not commonplace when the data for <br />these studies was collected: <br />Australian Road Research Board <br />Investigations of Distraction by Irrelevant Information (Johnston & Cole, 1976)15 <br />This research used five experiments to test whether drivers could maintain efficient <br />performance in their driving tasks while being subjected to content that was information <br />rich, but irrelevant to driving. The findings were that a small, but statistically significant <br />amount of performance degradation was observed when the participant was under a <br />critical load of stimuli. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.