Laserfiche WebLink
d. Full animation and video. <br />3. If one of the forms of static display is identified as the preferred operational mode, a <br />minimum display time should be established. This display time should correspond to the <br />operation roadway speed (rather than posted speed limit), allowing at most one image <br />transition during the time that the sign if visible to a driver traveling at the operational <br />speed. <br />If a shorter minimum display time is considered, the effects of message sequencing <br />should be considered. Wait intervals of more than 1-2 seconds between sequenced <br />messages have the potential to become more of a distraction as viewers wait impatiently <br />for the next screen, in an effort to view the complete message. <br />4. If the community wishes to accommodate animation or video in some or all locations <br />where dynamic are permitted, a minimum and maximum duration of a video image <br />should be established. The purpose for establishing a time limit is to ensure that the <br />message is conveyed in a short, concise time frame that does not cause slowing of traffic <br />to allow drivers to see the entire message. Given the creativity of advertising, these video <br />images may be seen as a form of entertainment, and people typically like to see an <br />entertaining message through to the end. <br />Differentiate between zoning districts where dynamic signs are permitted by right, and <br />zoning districts, overlay districts, or special districts where they should only be allowed <br />through the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. A CUP would involve public <br />notification and review and approval by the Planning Commission. Other options would <br />include a design review board or other dispute resolution process. <br />5. Consider the establishment of minimum distance requirements between electronic <br />outdoor advertising devices in relation to the zoning district or roadway context in which <br />the signs are allowed. <br />6. Consider size limitations on dynamic signs for zoning districts where they are allowed. <br />This may vary from one district to another. <br />7 Consider if dynamic signs are allowed independently, or if they must be incorporated into <br />the body of another sign, and therefore become a limited percentage of the overall sign <br />face. <br />8. Establish a requirement for that all dynamic signs that emit light be equipped with <br />mechanisms that allow brightness to be set at specific nit levels and respond accurately to <br />changing light conditions. The City must establish the authority to disable or turn the <br />device off if it malfunctions in a manner that creates excessive glare or intensity that <br />causes visual interference or blind spots, and require that the device remain inoperable <br />until such time that the owner demonstrates to the appropriate city official that the device <br />is in satisfactory working condition. If such technology is not available, consideration <br />should be give to banning dynamic signs that emit light until such time as the technology <br />allows brightness levels to be precisely controlled. <br />27 <br />