Laserfiche WebLink
th <br />5.03: Review Overlay Project 11-05 (157 Lane East of Ramsey Boulevard) <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer reviewed the staff report. He agreed the center line is not <br />the best but any repair options will create a project that does not look as well. He advised that <br />the core samples taken are all within specifications and he thinks the road is structurally sound, <br />noting it shows no signs of stress after being driven on for one year. He recommended leaving <br />the road as is and monitoring it to see if anything happens. <br /> <br />th <br />Dale McKusick, 6801 157 Lane NW, stated his concern that the asphalt is inconsistent in depth, <br />especially as it approaches the curb, an area that carries water drainage and traffic from plows <br />and garbage trucks. He stated he put in a new driveway for his neighbor and found there was <br />only one-half inch of asphalt at that driveway. He agreed with Public Works Superintendent <br />Riemer that grinding down the center would not be an acceptable repair. Mr. McKusick stated <br />the asphalt mat should be a consistent 1.5 to 2 inches thick from edge of curb to edge of curb, but <br />it is not and he thinks the road edges will come apart within several years. He noted the original <br />road was surfaced only once in 30 years, held up well, and is providing a great base for the <br />sealcoat project. However, as it deteriorates, there will be no recourse against the contractor and <br />everyone will be mad at the City. Mr. McKusick stated there has to be someone accountable and <br />if he is paying taxes, he wants it done right. <br /> <br />Chairperson Backous stated he agrees enforces its <br />building codes with strict inspections but he does not know about the inspection process for this <br />project. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGlone noted at the time of this project, the City had two engineers and used <br />the same engineering inspection team so there was not an issue with manpower to inspect the <br />project. <br /> <br />th <br />Barb McKusick, 6801 157 Lane NW, stated they were told it would be 1.5 to 2 inches thick <br />from curb to curb and that part of the existing bituminous curb would go away. However, along <br />most of the street the bituminous curb remained so people are asking how thin the asphalt is if <br />the curb is still showing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig asked what is the depth of the asphalt. <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer stated he can take additional core samples of the edges and <br />may find some at one inch and others at two inches. <br /> <br />Ms. McKusick stated the issue is that the asphalt mat is not consistent. <br /> <br />Mr. McKusick agreed that most of the bituminous curb remains after the project so it means the <br />matting is not consistent. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated the struggle is that a concrete curb it is definite but with bituminous <br />curbs, the spreader floats so the mat undulates. He asked Mr. McKusick if he thinks an entire <br />area is substandard. <br />Public Works Committee / July 17, 2012 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />