My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 02/05/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2013
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 02/05/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:51:15 AM
Creation date
2/28/2013 9:49:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
02/05/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Strommen stated she does not want to duplicate efforts. <br />needs to stay involved and Mr. Tinklenberg already has strong relationships in Ramsey. <br />Councilmember Elvig noted Mr. Tinklenberg can take a secondary seat in a County issue. <br />Mayor Strommen suggested staff run this proposal by Anoka County, about whether Mr. <br />Tinklenberg needs to be involved in some of the issues. She stated she does not want the City to <br />pay for the same set of services for which that Anoka County is also paying. Mayor Strommen <br />supported Ramsey working in cooperation with Anoka County and the City of Anoka so all are <br />on the same page but she is concerned that if each starts hiring their own resources, it may defeat <br />the purpose to coalesce around this issue. <br />City Administrator Ulrich confirmed that Anoka County has this project as its number one <br />priority, has a coordinator, a lobbyist in former Representative Kathy Tingelstad, as well as <br />Federal lobbyists. He noted that he and Mayor Strommen will be meting with those lobbyists <br />while in Washington, D.C. He stated he hopes The Tinklenberg Group proposal will pull <br />together the local steering group, business people, Anoka County, the City of Anoka, Chambers <br />of Commerce, and other interested stakeholders to put pressure on the State and Federal <br />governments. City Administrator Ulrich agreed it may be possible to cut back this proposal and <br />he is interested in talking with Anoka County about that possibility. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated this is an opportunity for Ramsey to put forth its best effort so it <br />will take some discussion. <br />Mayor Strommen stated she would like staff to hold conversations with Anoka County to assure <br />this proposal is scaled appropriately before it is considered by the Council. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated when he asked Mr. Tinklenberg about how it will look in <br />four months and form of delivery, Mr. Tinklenberg had been very clear and indicated the <br />majority focus on what he will deliver: the State funding piece, the Federal funding piece <br />specific to this project, and relationships that reside in other bodies with decision makers. <br />Mayor Strommen asked how much of that Anoka County is already doing that Ramsey can <br />"piggyback on" without duplicating that effort. She wanted to assure the City moved in concert <br />and compliment their efforts. <br />Councilmember Backous agreed, noting the entities could end up working against each other so <br />he thinks it is prudent to touch base with Anoka County and make sure efforts are coordinated. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated he does not want Ramsey to fall just short of being successful and <br />for $5,000, he would prefer to "push." He noted that Anoka County has a bigger picture in mind <br />than Ramsey and it may be a question of how it is managed. <br />City Administrator Ulrich agreed that Ramsey has its own interests that are independent of <br />Anoka County and the City of Anoka, and that is Armstrong Boulevard. <br />City Council Work Session / February 5, 2013 <br />Page 16 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.