06/05/90 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

988 Ramse'.~ [::i ty C,¢)LIFicEi } ] ['.,]5:~; Iqow'L'heri Blvd, Ramsev, I'IN ,553[~3 RECEIVED I 0V 1 lg88 re: pi. at approval ~or Cedar Hill s deve:,lopment It is my ur~derstar~din~.] th~.~t you will be c:ons:[derir~g in4:orma'Lior~ abouC '[:he p~at~ desitin ~-or the Cedar Flil].s J]eve.[opment at t-.he November 15 Cit~' CoLincil meet:ing, We.:.: have beel~ re~:.iclen'Ls o~: FILmter's Hill ~:of over ]zf. year's. ]l-~ l:hat: t. ime we have el"~)oyed and appreciat, ed the low tra~C.tc · vol Lulls!./ ~'~" [£,~E.~[J []¥' lbs..t)- pi ~t- [J~,s) ~!["~ - Il'lc e;.,'is'L:Jng pi. an .~or' C'edar Hills, W:[r-,derner'e Woods, and the Good Valu ] and would have many cle{r'imen~al e~ects on our neighl:)orl-~ood. ]"here are only 28 ~anlilies in this cleve]opment. We 4:uncled blackt, op roads ~or OL~r development on]y one year ago. ]]t would be un~air ~or us to have our roads worn ou{ because o~ heavy Cr'a~:~ic genera{ed b~ 22E~-.23~ ~:amilies ~r'om the 3 proposed projects to the east c)~ us. C~LII" r'C,a,[JE; are narrow. We have deep ditches. We mus'~ pay for the upkeep of our roads. Many ~:ami].ies here have small children. ]'heir safety is a major concern when so much t. raffic is generat, ed by projects such as t. hese. ]"hese developments shou].d be looked at as a group, not as 3 ind:i, vidual plat designs. Any approval ~or the total project should include a road south ~rom Cedar Hil'~.s to 116 and a road west to 57 (an extension o~ ]42nd Ave.) across the nor'th sicle o~ the 4~ acres direct].¥ south o¥ Hunter's Hill. 143rd Ave. in Hunter's Hill should remain a cul de sac. A dev[~:].opment p]an can be denied i¥ it adverse].'y a¥.fects a sur-rounding neiQhborhood. I believe the current proposed plans SHOULD BE DENIED ur~less the tra~:ic problems are adc:ir'essed sat~ s-Factori:ly ~(~, that they do not have an adverse =~.~: ~:ect. on t I've surf OL.U-~c~i r'~C! nei g!h~,orhoocis. Si ncerel y ~ Kay F'lcCul ~ ~';~.' Ftunter's Hill resJ. dent: