10/02/90 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

7) Landscaping and Screening: Landscaping is required adjacent to Sunfish Lake Blvd. A Phase I landscaping plan has been submitted which includes landscaping along Sunfish Lake Blvd. as well as the North and South boundaries of the property. 8) Building Materials: Exterior walls facing Sunfish Lake Blvd. and the North and East property lines will be a combination of two types of decorative concrete block. The walls facing the southern property line which encompasses the majority of the loading docks will be plain concrete blocks. The materials proposed for use are consistent with code requirements. 9) Drainage: Drainage from the site will be conveyed to the east ditch line of Sunfish Lake Blvd. (CR57) from two 15" storm line. The development of Phase I and II will increase run-off from this site during storm events. The County's general policy is to allow no increase over the existing run-off conditions. You should document the amount of run-off increase caused by the proposed development and obtain approval from the County Highway Department. lo) Access: The parcel has frontage only along CR 57 and a single 24 foot access point is proposed approximately 40 feet south of the Northern property line. This access will be approximately 142 feet from the centerline of Sunfish Lake Court, the nearest intersection. The turning movement required near the southwestern corner of the building will be impossible for semitrailers and will be difficult for even smaller trucks. Truck access could be provided to the rear loading area by excluding the pavement around the East side of the building (not presently included in the Phase I development proposal). Alternately, moving the access to the southern portion of the property would also provide adequate truck access. 11) Lighting: Lighting is proposed to be located around the pefimter of the parking areas at intervals ranging from between 80 and 180 feet. The standards nearest the roadway are approximately 80 feet from the edge of the pavement, and should not emit excessive lighting off of the property and onto the roadway. 12) The following is a list of items that were not submitted as required by City Code: a) b) c) d) e) A property survey certified by a re~stered land surveyor. The building design must be certified by a registered architect or engineer. Sign(s) are not identified. Projection of water usage. Location of refuse containers. I would recommend approval contingent upon County Highway Department approval of the drainage plan, a variance from loading dock requirements, modifying site access to alleviate the concerns described in Item #10 and providing the required information enumerated in Item #12. Sincerely, City Engineer SJJ:ccr