Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />RE: <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Ramsey Planning Commission <br />William K. Goodrich, City Attorney <br />Aluminum Processing, Inc. CUP <br />December 4, 1990 <br /> <br />At your meeting on November 20, 1990, regarding the above CUP <br />application, you requested that I issue an opinion to you as to <br />whether or not the proposed aluminum processing and recycling <br />facility is a solid waste management facility under the definition <br />of Ordinance 90-5. <br /> <br />Ordinance 90-5 defines a "Solid Waste Management Facility" as "a <br />facility for the storage, collection, transportation, processing <br />or reuse, conversion or disposal of solid waste." "Solid Waste" <br />is defined as "garbage, refuse, sludge, from a water supply <br />treatment plant or air containment.treatment facility and other <br />discarded waste materials .... " <br /> <br />In addition to the above definitions, I have reviewed the <br />definitions of "Refuse", "Rubbish", "Solid Waste" and "Solid Waste <br />Collection" as defined in Minnesota Rules 3 6035.0300; the <br />definition of "Recycling" and related terms as defined in MSA <br />115A.03 and the definitions of "Waste Facility" and "Waste <br />Management" as defined in the Metropolitan Council's Waste <br />Management Guide. <br /> <br />"Solid Waste" is defined in part as garbage and refuse. "Refuse" <br />is defined in part as rubbish and rubbish is defined as paper, <br />cardboard, tin cans, glass, etc. <br /> <br />In my opinion, application of the above term definitions to the <br />proposed CUP requires that the proposed use be termed a Solid Waste <br />Management Facility under Ordinance 90-5. This opinion is reached, <br />of course, by use of the Ordinance as written. I am aware that <br />certain members of the Planning Commission believe that the <br />proposed use should not be classified as a Solid Waste Management <br />Facility as the material which would be brought in will be recycled <br />for another use and is therefore not solid waste. My reading of <br />the definitions cited above, however, leads me to believe that <br />those items are still considered solid waste, even though they will <br />be processed or recycled into another use and not discarded. There <br />simply is no other written ordinance or statute language which <br />allows me to conclude otherwise. <br /> <br /> <br />