My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
01/03/89
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
01/03/89
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 8:52:01 AM
Creation date
11/13/2003 2:31:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
01/03/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alternative designs ~i!l be evaluated for each proposed co~.~Lmunity <br />septic system. Design alternatives may include, but not be limited <br />to, standard drainfields, sand filters with standard drainfields, <br />multiple mound systems, alternating seepage beds with pressure distri- <br />bution of effluent, tuck system (methanol mediated nitrate reduction <br />to nitrogen gas), sand filters with surface discharge, extension of <br />sanitary sewer se~,ice to the affected area. The selection of an <br />appropriate septic system design ~iL1 be based on soil suitability, <br />groun~ water effects (mounding, contamination), area requirements, <br />surface discharge requirements, etc. Cost analysis will include <br />assessment of the projected e;[tensicn date of Dub!ic se~ices, ~ <br /> ~ any, <br />to the subject area. <br /> <br />A City of Ramsey pe-~mit will be required for installation of any <br />comr. unity .septic system. If average daily flow exceeds !0,000 · <br />gallons, a permit from ~[PCA is required as well. As part of the ldPCA <br />permit, monitoring wells are required. The City of Ramsey may re~aire <br />monitoring or other septic system performance data on systems <br />producing less than !0,000 gallons per day. <br /> <br />In short, while a regional rural preservation policy may be laudibie <br />and indeed workable in some outlying areas of the metropolitan region, <br />it makes little sense to apply it to a community %,here nearly 75% of <br />the land area outside the I.~SA is currently developed. <br /> <br />There is not an extensive rural character to maintain. There is <br />little agriculture which can be expected to continue. Lastly, there <br />is no physical or environmental basis for restricting development due <br />to sewage disposal requirements for !0 acres of land. <br /> <br />At the same time,'the City recognizes that' long te,--m~ low density <br />development (2.5 acre lots) such as is occurring in Ramsey and in <br />neig.hboring cor~munities can be more e>~ensive than t)~ical urban <br />settings. This is due to demands for some urban level services such <br />as parks developmen%, streets, fire protection even though these costs <br />must be distributed over much lower population densities. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.