Laserfiche WebLink
Alternative designs ~i!l be evaluated for each proposed co~.~Lmunity <br />septic system. Design alternatives may include, but not be limited <br />to, standard drainfields, sand filters with standard drainfields, <br />multiple mound systems, alternating seepage beds with pressure distri- <br />bution of effluent, tuck system (methanol mediated nitrate reduction <br />to nitrogen gas), sand filters with surface discharge, extension of <br />sanitary sewer se~,ice to the affected area. The selection of an <br />appropriate septic system design ~iL1 be based on soil suitability, <br />groun~ water effects (mounding, contamination), area requirements, <br />surface discharge requirements, etc. Cost analysis will include <br />assessment of the projected e;[tensicn date of Dub!ic se~ices, ~ <br /> ~ any, <br />to the subject area. <br /> <br />A City of Ramsey pe-~mit will be required for installation of any <br />comr. unity .septic system. If average daily flow exceeds !0,000 · <br />gallons, a permit from ~[PCA is required as well. As part of the ldPCA <br />permit, monitoring wells are required. The City of Ramsey may re~aire <br />monitoring or other septic system performance data on systems <br />producing less than !0,000 gallons per day. <br /> <br />In short, while a regional rural preservation policy may be laudibie <br />and indeed workable in some outlying areas of the metropolitan region, <br />it makes little sense to apply it to a community %,here nearly 75% of <br />the land area outside the I.~SA is currently developed. <br /> <br />There is not an extensive rural character to maintain. There is <br />little agriculture which can be expected to continue. Lastly, there <br />is no physical or environmental basis for restricting development due <br />to sewage disposal requirements for !0 acres of land. <br /> <br />At the same time,'the City recognizes that' long te,--m~ low density <br />development (2.5 acre lots) such as is occurring in Ramsey and in <br />neig.hboring cor~munities can be more e>~ensive than t)~ical urban <br />settings. This is due to demands for some urban level services such <br />as parks developmen%, streets, fire protection even though these costs <br />must be distributed over much lower population densities. <br /> <br /> <br />