My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/19/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2013
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/19/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:33:43 AM
Creation date
3/20/2013 11:11:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
03/19/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Backous and Councilmember Elvig. Voting No: <br />Councilmember McGlone. <br />5.03: Discuss 2013 Capital Improvement Street Projects <br />Interim Engineer Nelson reviewed the staff report, schedule of 2013 street projects, and funding <br />options. <br />Councilmember McGlone asked about the likelihood of the Mississippi River Trail being built in <br />Ramsey or if the grant money for that project can wait. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated staff is working through <br />those questions with the City of Anoka and finding the same budgetary problems. He explained <br />the federal processes are costly and complicated and staff is facing engineering costs that had not <br />been projected and engineering work that cannot be handled in-house. In terms of the $380,000 <br />grant shared between Ramsey and Anoka, it is for a 2013 project and he does not know if they <br />can get an extension. Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood indicated <br />staff has looked into this question in great detail and determined there are implications that are <br />not favorable for the quality of the Mississippi River trail along Riverdale Drive if the project is <br />not shrunk. He reviewed potential options for separated trail and pavement marking but noted <br />that is not what the City said it would do. In addition, there are improvements to Riverdale Park <br />that adds value to the grant. <br />Councilmember McGlone asked whether the trail can be installed and road project done <br />afterwards. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that is one of the original <br />problems, to have adequate boulevards for snow storage. He noted if it is on the south side, it <br />impacts seven residential homes. If the road is shrunk, it would move the road away from the <br />homes and that may be a good thing for the residents. Parks and Assistant Public Works <br />Superintendent Riverblood stated if the City does the trail or a wide sidewalk on the south side, it <br />may get separated and maintain snow storage. <br />Councilmember McGlone asked if there is ability to build the trail with the funds received. He <br />also asked if there is enough room to build at its width at the back of the curb irrespective of the <br />road project. He felt the City could get the boulevard later when the road project happens. <br />City Administrator Ulrich advised there is a need to value engineer the project to get the best <br />value. He stated the issues include whether to tear up a road with an estimated ten years of life <br />to construct a $1.3 million project for a $380,000 grant. He indicated the City will need to <br />determine what makes the most sense, solutions to lower the cost, and to leverage the grant. <br />Chairperson Backous noted this will be discussed with the City Council and the purpose tonight <br />is to provide information. <br />Public Works Committee / November 20, 2012 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.