Laserfiche WebLink
It is not expected that the City would complete the private improvements, such as site grading, landscaping, <br />driveways, etc. In addition, Staff would not recommend completing the sidewalk improvements, which would be <br />public infrastructure, as those improvements may be impacted by construction activities. Sidewalk alternatives do <br />exist in the area. Similar to the City's current process for single-family homes, completion of these improvements <br />could be a contingency of the certificate of occupancy in addition to the financial surety proposed by the <br />Developer. <br />Alternative # 1 <br />Approve the transfer of the Agreement to Northgate Church, Inc. and require the Developer to submit the surety, in <br />the amount that was requested by the Developer. The assignment is a necessary step as PSD is no longer owner of <br />the parcel and will not be completing the improvements. It appears that the City would have sufficient financial <br />surety to address the issues as indicated above. <br />Alternative #2 <br />Approve the transfer of the Agreement to Northgate Church, Inc. and require the Developer to submit the standard <br />surety. The assignment is a necessary step as PSD is no longer owner of the parcel and will not be completing the <br />improvements. It appears that the City would have sufficient financial surety to address the issues as indicated <br />above. <br />Alternative #3 <br />Deny the transfer of the Agreement to Northgate Church, Inc. and require the Developer to submit the standard <br />surety. The assignment is a necessary step as PSD is no longer owner of the parcel and will not be completing the <br />improvements. This alternative is not recommended by Staff. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends approval of the revised Development Agreement and Development Permit for NORTHGATE <br />ADDITION, with the modification to financial surety requirements to reflect 100% of the required improvements. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with review of the Application are the responsibility of the Applicant. <br />Council Action: <br />Motion to approve the revised Development Agreement and Development Permit for NORTHGATE ADDITION, <br />with the modification to financial surety requirements to reflect 100% of the required improvements. <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Site Plan <br />REVISED Development Agreement <br />REVISED Development Permit <br />Developer Estimate <br />City Estimate <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 03/21/2013 02:27 PM <br />Form Started By: Tim Gladhill Started On: 02/14/2013 12:54 PM <br />Final Approval Date: 03/21/2013 <br />