Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. <br />City of Roseville, 295 N.W.2d <br />604 (Minn. 1980). <br />Lowry v. City of Mankato, <br />231 Minn. 108, 42 N.W.2d <br />553 (Minn. 1950). <br />Village of St. Louis Park v. <br />Casey, 218 Minn. 394, 16 <br />N.W.2d 459 (Minn. 1944). <br />Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. <br />City of Roseville, 295 N.W.2d <br />604 (Minn. 1980). <br />Amcon Corp. v. City of <br />Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 66 <br />(Minn 1984). <br />Sample Definitions Section. <br />Hubbard Broadcasting Inc. <br />v. City of Afton, 323 N.W.2d <br />757, (Minn. 1982). <br />DI MA Corp. v. City of St. <br />Cloud, 562 N.W.2d 312 <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 1997). <br />Minn. Stat. §§ 462.351 - <br />462.365. <br />Minn. Stat. §§ 473.851 - <br />473.871. <br />Nordmarken v. City of <br />Richfield, 641 N.W.2d 343 <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 2002). <br />• "lawn and garden center," <br />• The words "accessory ", "subordinate," "incidental," and "main," <br />• "structure" <br />When a court is called upon to resolve a controversy over an undefined or <br />ambiguous word or phrase in a city ordinance, the court may not always <br />interpret the ordinance in the manner the city would prefer. The court may, <br />but is not required, to give deference to the city's interpretation of the <br />ordinance. <br />In interpreting zoning ordinances, the court will attempt to find the plain and <br />ordinary meaning of the terms. The court will interpret any doubtful <br />language against the city and in favor of the landowner. <br />Only in limited circumstances, where the language is so ambiguous on its <br />face that a plain meaning cannot be understood, will the court consider <br />evidence of the city's intent in drafting the ordinance. <br />The best way to avoid the time and expense of a lawsuit over basic terms in <br />a zoning ordinance is clear drafting from the outset. A definition section is <br />essential to any zoning ordinance. Terms and concepts that may be <br />reasonably subject to more than one interpretation should be explicitly <br />defined in this section. <br />C. Drafting a legally defensible zoning ordinance <br />In drafting a zoning ordinance, cities must also draft an ordinance that <br />conforms to the requirements of state and federal law. In addition, cities <br />must draft ordinances that are consistent with state and federal court rulings. <br />1. The Municipal Planning Act <br />Cities have a wide range of discretion in developing a zoning ordinance. <br />City zoning requirements can range from very complex to minimal. <br />However, all city zoning authority is granted to cities by and subject to the <br />Municipal Planning Act. Ordinances may vary from city to city, but all must <br />comply with both the substantive and procedural requirements contained in <br />the Municipal Planning Act. <br />It is important to note that the Municipal Planning Act has specific <br />provisions related to local zoning control of: <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 9/10/2012 <br />Zoning Guide for Cities Page 9 <br />