Laserfiche WebLink
lot in the 50 foot buffer area, however City Staff is requesting it not be located there. He stated <br />their only other choice would be to take out additional parking. <br /> <br />Rick Olson, architect for the development, indicated they are complying with all items except <br />one from the Staff Review Letter with their new site plan, which was the narrowing of the access. <br />He stated Staff is recommending they reduce it to 35 feet, however their proposal is not unlike <br />Shorewood RV. He indicated Staff recommended catch basin structures, and they have provided <br />curb cuts and rip-rap for water flow. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon asked how big their curb cut width would <br />be. <br /> <br />Mr. Olson stated they are proposing five vehicles wide. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon stated there is space there to expand to 10 <br />vehicles. <br /> <br />Mr. Olson indicated they would deal with that when they come in for a permit to expand. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler noted there is also concerns about lighting and the impact to the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski advised the Code says the light source cannot be viewed off the <br />property, however because they are dealing with very high vehicles the fixtures stand 40 to 50 <br />feet off the ground. He would like to see the specifications that show they will conform to the <br />City lighting standards, as even with full cut-off, at 40 feet off the ground it will be difficult not <br />to have some light off the property. He stated as for the curb cuts, he was not aware Shorewood <br />RV has such wide curb cuts. He asked them to keep in mind Riverdale will be the frontage road <br />to Highway 10 and a major area. He stated having an access point where you can ingress and <br />egress with such a variable is concerning. <br /> <br />Mr. Olson stated the idea would be for the longer units to be able to access the maintenance bays, <br />as some of these vehicles are 40 to 50 feet long. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated they also have had discussions on the ponding. He <br />acknowledged the revised plan has been submitted, however he is wondering if they could push <br />the pond and widen the pavement in that area. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon stated it would come into the buffer area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked what Staff's concern is with having the trash enclosure in the <br />buffer area. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated them is nothing in the Code that says it cannot be, however Staff <br />felt it conflicted with the intent of the Code. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 2, 2003 <br /> Page 12 of 17 <br /> <br /> <br />