Laserfiche WebLink
The sketch plan is proposing to <br />cons~ruc~ private street~ <br />throughout the enfir~ residential <br />development. The building <br />entrances wiE ~ont onto a 28 foot <br />~de private s~e~t. ~e 2g-foot <br />p~vate s~eet will be ufitized for <br />v~kor p~ng ~d ~ont e~ce <br />to ~e unit. Ci~ Code pe~B 28- <br />fbor ~de private ~eeB ~ 'bng ~ <br />p~king is restricted to one side. <br /> <br />The development is also <br /> <br />proposing 20-foot wide private streets or "alleyways" throug_hofit the project ares. The alleyways <br />will be located along the rear side of the structure and will provide owner access to the garage <br />enrranc~ of the unit. City. Code does not address the proposed 20-foot wide private stree~ <br /> <br />C~ Code requires at least one main <br />thoroughfare throu~_2a the development <br />to be dedicated as a pubIic street. Staff <br />is recommending that the sketch plan be <br />revised to include a combination of <br />public and private streets. <br /> <br />The R-3 district requires a 25-foot <br />building setback along private streets. <br />The units are setback from the private <br />streets ranging fi-om 20 - 28 feet. In <br />general the fl-ont yard setback (faces the <br />2g-foot wide pnvaze street) is 28 feet <br />and the rear yard setback (faces the 20- <br />foot w/de alleyways) is 20 feet <br /> <br />In severs2 cases the private streets <br />exceed private street leng'dn restrictions <br />outlined in the R-3 district. The proposed setback and private street 'width and len~h deviations <br />will need to be addressed by the Planmng Commission and City, Council. <br /> <br />A detailed drainage and g-raring plan will be addressed during the preliminary, ptar process. The <br />~roject is subiect to the review and pe=nirting process of the Lower Rum Privet Watershed <br />Management Organization (~40). <br /> <br />The Park and tLecreation Commission will review the sketch plan at their November meeting for <br />recommendations on park dedication and trail ali_m-nment. <br /> <br />Reeommendntion: <br /> <br />The development desarts from the normal CiE/ standards fbr street width, length, and unit <br />setbacks. The proximately of units, use of sidewalks and alleyways, and architectural treatments <br />gives the development an elegant and quaint feel. The development proposal contains elements <br />of new urbanist philosophy that emphasize pedesrrlan scale and sense of community.. Given the <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br /> <br />