Laserfiche WebLink
BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case gl: Draft Horse Ordinance: <br /> <br />Commissioner Shumwav reviewed, in detail, the proposed amendment to the horse <br />ordinance that was denied by City Council in 1988. <br />Commissioner Hetland felt that the manure controls proposed by the Saddle Club were <br />more specific and should replace what is proposed in the draft ordinance. <br /> <br />Some concerns ',,,'ere expressed regarding the enforceability of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich explained that the horse ordinance would be enforced similar to a nuisance <br />ordinance, for which is a violation is a misdemeansor. Mr. Goodrich noted that the courts <br />are not set up to impound horses and the Horsemans Committee called for in the ordinance <br />can only be an advisory body to City Council; the City does have the power to initiate an <br />injunction if a horse is being mistreated. <br /> <br />},ir. Goodrich suggested that the draft ordinance be revised to include a penalty clause. <br /> <br />It was noted that animal owners are liable for damages caused by their animals and a <br />discussion ensued regarding whether or not canD.'ing insurance is a personal responsibility <br />or something the city should require. It ,,,,'as suggested that a future article of the Ramsay <br />Resident address the issue of owners being liable for O;eir animals. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley suggested that the draft ordinance also note that the Horseman's Committee <br />would be required to maintain meeting minutes. <br /> <br />Councilembers DeLuca and Pearson expressed concern with reducing the acreage <br />requirements for keeping horses. <br /> <br />The consensus ,,,,,as that the Planning and Zoning Commission should make some <br />modifications to the proposed horse ordinance before placing it on a City Council agenda <br />for reconsideration. <br /> <br />Case #2: <br /> <br />Discussion Regarding Park Needs And A Draft Park Dedication <br />Ordinance: <br /> <br />Mr. Otto stated that the City currently has 29 paris within it's park system that encompass <br />approximately 200+ acres, 100 acres of which are wetlands and unseab!e. In terms of <br />actual acreage, the City maintains 69-66 acres of park land. Standards indicate that a city of <br />Ramsey's size should have 12-15 acres of park land per 1000 in population. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto stated that Rarnsey's needs regarding pm'-k issues are as follows: <br /> <br />Develop an invento:'y of parks whic. h includes development plans and topo~raphical <br />irffo.,'-rr'.,afion for ea:.h park. <br /> <br />b. Reviev,. and update the Comprehensive Park Plan. <br /> <br />City Council/Planning & Zoning/Park & Recreation <br />February 22, 1989 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />