Laserfiche WebLink
CASE #7: <br /> <br />REVIEW ORDINANCE WHICH ESTABLISII~S THE PLANNING AND ZONING <br />COMMISSION AND TI~ PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br /> By: Mark S. Banwart~ Comm~nlty Development Director <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />It has been brought to the attention of the Ramsey Community Development <br />Department that ordinances which established a Planning and Zoning <br />Commission and the Park and Recreation Commission are different. For your <br />information, the following items are enclosed: <br /> <br />h o <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Commission establishment of Commission <br />Park and Recreation Commission establishment of Commission <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The Park and Recreation Commission establishment of Commission is much <br />more thorough in describing the components of why there is such a commission, <br />scope, objectives, duties and responsibilities, composition, members method of <br />selection and term of office, removal, rules and procedures, meetings and ex- <br />official members. The Planning and Zoning Commission estab]ishment of <br />Commission lacks many of these considerations. <br /> <br />Recommendations: <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission consider <br />modifications to appropriate City Ordinances which establish its Commission, <br />both for consistency with other Commissions establishment as well as the <br />specifics of orderly operation and mission of the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Commlssion Action: <br /> <br />Based upon discussion. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br /> <br />City Administrator X <br />City Attorney . X <br />City Engineer .X <br />Community Development Director .X <br /> <br />Chief of Police <br />Finance Officer <br />Park & Recreation Comm. <br />City Council <br /> <br />.X <br /> <br /> <br />