Laserfiche WebLink
Thc total rigM-of-way for Ut~' S~ccx consists of 3(~ ieee. If U~c S~cc: were to b~ <br />the rigtn-of-way should bc increased to 50 fee~ and thc' road cons~ctcd 26 fee: wioc with <br />24 foo: ridini' surface and a ] foo', bem~ on each side. Thc pu~osc in cons=u:m~U thc road <br />26 feet wide versus 2g ieee would ~ to avoid havin~ to remove mature ~ees i;~ the area. in <br />accordance with thc City's cu~enl asscssmcm poticy, thc improvcmcms would ~ <br />to thc benefinin~ property owners. ~c total cs~matcd cost for the prqiect is $26,500. Thc <br />number of units to be assessed is 10. The esfimamd cost per unit is $2(~)0 or $~5 per uni~ <br />amortized over ] 0 years. Mr. Raati~:a then made a slide presentation of Ute S~eet in it's <br />cxistin~ condition and othcr~, strcct~: indicative of what would be propos~ for Ute Sxeet. <br />Mr. Raatikka stated up~radin~ Ute Sxeex as described would require acquifin~ anothm ]0 <br />feet of right-of-way on each side of the road. Drainage improvements would have to be <br />studied more c~efulh, in a fcasibiliw report. <br /> <br />/,, resident inquir~ as to why upending Ute Sa-cee is being discussed. <br /> <br />Lind:,, Wolfbauer- 4947 ]79th Lane - S:::ted that upon her reaues~. Counci! reques:zd :: <br />preliminary study regarding upgrading Ute S~eet. Ute S~ee: in i~'s present condition has <br />been a constam problem, source of imtation and presents some safety concerns. There are <br />drainage problems in the ~ca and the road is no: eeuai!v shm~ed by residents on both sides <br />of the s~eet. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that in order for this project to proceed any further, the affected <br />residents would have to submit a petition to City Council requesting a feasibility study be <br />prepared regarding upending Ute Street. <br /> <br />Lois Hanson - 18026 Ute Street - Inquired if Ute Street could be just up~aded to a Class 5 <br />surface. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka replied that it is possible to just bring Ute Street up to Class 5 standards bm <br />without the construction of ditches, there will still be washouts in the area. Up~ading to <br />Class 5 would also be assessed to the benefitting property owners. <br /> <br />Jeff Rockow - 18015 Ute Street - Stated that he doubts even the consmaction of ditches will <br />alleviate drainage problems in the area. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka replied that a feasibiliLv report would study the drainage in the area. <br /> <br />Ron Nelson - 18055 Ute Street - Inquired if the turn-aroud would Mso be expanded. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka replied that the turn-around would ~ expanded to at least 60 feet in diameter. <br /> <br />Angela Lenarz - 4925 179th Lane - Stated that her property always getls flooded with oil <br />and it isn't fair. <br /> <br />Linda Wolfbauer - Noted that the residents on the west side of Ute are already subject to a <br /> <br />CiB, Council,/Augus: 15, 1989 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />