Laserfiche WebLink
()Ii thc C~tS; Oil]\ COIlU'iOUtltl~ ](i ~cei I0 [hU TOa¢. lmprovcmcn($ tr. L'tc 2ut't'; w~lJ n',crcas~' <br />road 1o.ac: to their homes hue mcx GOIi'i warn to contribute [lllX 1,~. op~,. "~.,x 507 thc road. <br /> <br />Angle Lenarz - Stated th:,.~ the road should have been propcriy aligned when t~c area was <br />developed witi~ homes. There have t~oon probicms associated with nc: icncc aligmm'n: <br />over Ibc years; a sup'ex'or checked mree weeks ago and aetcm~ined fha: her fca,c: is all (}r~ <br />her property; if Utc ~> improved the fence would have to ;,gain be moved; area drainage <br />runs to her property a:,d construction of ditches will increase tim[ problem. <br /> <br />Dick Giddings - 180(;, Utc Street - Stated that it appears that Mr. l',;:atild;a is proposing <br />control the drainage 'at gn'ade' which would require raising the elevation of the road (luite <br />bit. Stated tha~ he sympathizes with those having water problem> hut hc would .just <br />soon leave Utc Street in n's existing condition. <br /> <br />Jeff Rockow - Stated thai hc oocs have drainage problems but i~ doesn't bother him much: <br />if Utc is upgraded, hc does wztm to know wh:t~ will bt' done 1o $1o~' thc v,'[iter ~ro:Ti coming <br /> <br />.,'x,~,x o, Rcm'~ann repiicd flint tile petition could specify whatever mmrovements ';" ' ' <br />desire. <br /> <br />Linda Wo]fbauer - inquired if the petition imp]les tha~ the resJden,'s agree, i,:. the <br />imp,'ovemen~ prqiect. <br /> <br />Yh-. Raatikka explained that a petition from at least .35% of the benefitting property owners <br />is required in order for ti~e. City to prepare a feasibility stud.','; upon completion of the study, <br />a public hearing is conducted; following the hearing, Cit.',' Council m',&es a decision to <br />approve or den,,' the project; if the project is approved, the residents have a 60 da,,' time <br />frame in which they have the option to take no action and accept the project or petition <br />against the project; if over 50% of the benefitting property owners petition against it. the <br />project must be stopped. <br /> <br />Linda Wolfbauer - Inquired if the City could do anything about complaints of drainage <br />problems in the area if the residents vote down the project. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann replied that according to the City Charter, the majority rule and the City <br />would not be able to m~ce drainage improvements in the area if the residents voted it down. <br />However, the Cig, can override the Charter for reasons of health and welfare. <br /> <br />Mr. Ha2'tley noted that it is a difficult pr~ess to override the Charter. <br /> <br />Duane Holmes - 18045 V~,azo Stree: Noted that all that exists for right-of-way is o., feet <br />and it is alt dedicated by the property owners on the west side of the road: inquired if the <br />residents on the east side would be dedicating the additional 20 feet of right-of-way needed <br />to up~ade Ute Street. <br /> <br />City Council/August 15, 1989 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />