My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11/06/89
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
11/06/89
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 8:58:20 AM
Creation date
11/19/2003 10:00:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
11/06/1989
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ra~nsey City Plan:',' .f Board <br /> <br />-2- August 2, 1983 <br /> <br />~~~-~0m~eofi{,F~ which have been ~tated hereafter~ <br /> <br /> S~tlo~ 1 ?~I IZD (c) -~t~tes <br /> ~_xDevel~men~nah be conducted ~o that the <br /> maxima number of tree~ are prederved~y7 <br /> <br /> aS~nd natura cl~aring~ . . . <br /> "L -- ' ' -'-- ' ; ,'r ....... <br /> <br /> We are concerned that the 8i5~ and n~er of <br /> river frontage lots not be determined by the nm- <br /> ber of available clearings, because reasonable <br /> va]u~ will be achieved only if lots can be pla~ed <br /> in an orderly manner at the frontage allowed by <br /> the ordinance. If the number of lots is Iimited to <br /> the number of available clearings, the number of <br /> potential lots may be substantially reduced result- <br /> ing in substantial money loss to land owners. <br /> <br />.o~ the density'Of tree'g;" utilizing n~'~'s-~r~--~tocks <br />of a minimum of 1-3/4" diameter measured one <br /> <br />foot above the ground .... ~-~-6'clrl'fl~-fl l~aal--zn--h~o- <br /> <br /> not' recluce the ex~stzng crown <br />~lopment sl~Lt ...................... -" ........ "' ' <br />c .~ir'~_greater thaia- 5 0 % .... " <br /> <br />We are concerned as to which of these provisions <br />co~_t+ro!z thc o~,,=~, Lh~ ozd~i;ance cho~ltq e~+her:~ <br /> <br />"in no case need density exceed 10 trees <br />per acre" or <br /> <br /> ~e elopment shall not reduce the existing <br /> crown cover greater than 50.0% . . ." <br /> <br /> e are concerned b. ecause some of our acreage is <br /> quite wooded with smaller trees, a substantial <br /> amount_ of~w_.hich, need to be cleared to make <br />,~e ent lots. <br /> are also concerned, that the ordinance should <br /> not require the. r..y~eolanting of_any trees~ which need <br /> to be removed because of serious storm damage, <br /> disease or other acts of God. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.