My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11/06/89
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1989
>
11/06/89
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 8:58:20 AM
Creation date
11/19/2003 10:00:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
11/06/1989
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Planning Board <br /> <br />August <br /> <br />.m~-Sectio--! 70. O112E~/ivIronrnental l~e'r'rnlt s-~ <br /> <br /> We are concerned that this section provides too <br /> complicated and too costly requirements, so that <br /> they will act as a deterrent to development. <br /> <br /> It requires reports from hydrologists, biologists, <br /> botanists, soil scientists and other technical per- <br /> sons, as well as a very costly survey. It requires <br /> that all flora and fauna be identified and mapped <br /> including identifying, describing and mapping <br /> every tree. On some of our potential iota there <br /> may be more than lO0 trees. <br /> <br />Gentlemen, this section is unreasonable in its re- <br />quirements. Certainly you can devise an ordinance <br />which will accomplish your intent and still facilitate <br />development, instead of making it so diffi~ <br />co~stly. This section (with others) elirninat~s_~_s~e <br />the possib~-{Y¥ of a sma}l developer or land owner <br />8-&-~ping the property, because of the heavy capi- <br />tal requirements. <br /> <br />· .... ~ ~- - ~ · · ~,q- · '. t <br /> ~onclxt~ons ..... [S;/lch cond~ttons mav~eqmre 'a~ <br /> ~~n.ihe form of a ~~n~fl~, c~~ <br /> <br /> g~~e~~ as determined b~ the titv Engine~ <br /> <br />We have two concerns .relative to this provision: <br /> <br />a) <br /> <br />This is a very costly requirement which, in con- <br />junction with the costly requirements discussed <br />above, discourage development, if not make it <br />unlikely. I am told by City personnel that is is <br />not a typical provision for developmeRt else- <br />where in the City. <br /> <br />b) This provision has no place buried in this ordin- <br /> <br />an~_D_c2-- It.belongs in the City Subdivision Ordinance, <br />if it is to be anywhere. <br /> <br />1983 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.