My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 05/11/1989
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1989
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 05/11/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 10:15:30 AM
Creation date
11/19/2003 2:51:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
05/11/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Pearson stated that he appreciates developer concerns wit}; showing up at <br />meetings with attorneys and engineers only to have their cases tabled. Council is aware of <br />the problem and will do what they can to alleviate the problem. <br /> <br />Councilm::mber Peterson noted that there has been a large turn-over in .city staff over the <br />years and each time there is a turn-over, developers have to begin all over again; hopefully, <br />that will change in the future. The communication level between commissions, council and <br />staff is in need of revision. Councilmember Peterson stated that he hopes what has come <br />out of tonight's meeting does not stop at this point; the concerns expressed are legitimate <br />and he does not foresee the developers coming back in six months with the same <br />complaints. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann stated that the developers have taken the time to present their concern~ to <br />Council and it is Council's responsibility as elected officials to see if the problems can be <br />remedied. Mayor Reimann stated that City Council should meet with City Staff, Planning <br />and Zoning Commission and Park and Recreation Commission to review the issues <br />brought up at tonight's meeting and make recommendations to make the process more <br />workable. <br /> <br />Mr. Darryl Fults stated that the Economic Development Commission has a good <br />relationship with City Council and is willing to function as a liaison with developers. Mr. <br />Fults stated that the City needs somebody to follow up on economic development leads. <br />Mr. Fults inquired as to why a commercial or industrial building needs to go through"the <br />site plan process if the structure meets all the requirements of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley replied that it is unusual to require site plan reviews of all commercial/industrial <br />construction but there is a special interest in Ramsey in malting sure commercial investment <br />is made in a way that is consistent with Cit.',, Council policy. But ,,'hen issues are dealt <br />with on a case by case basis as a Council, there is a ~eater tendency to deviate from a <br />consistent trend. <br /> <br />Mr. Clayton Berg noted that the Anoka City Council also has a policy to reviews, all <br />commercial buildings. The building code standard is far below what Ramsey has <br />established for it's commercial/industrial areas and by bringing those plans to Council, <br />standards can be upg-raded. Site plan reviews by Council is a good policy. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Cich to adjourn the <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmem~rs DeLuca, Peterson, Cich <br />and Pearson. Vo:ing No: None. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. <br /> <br />Resp~ffully submitted, <br /> <br />Sylvia Frolik <br />Secretary <br /> <br />David Hartley <br />City Adminisu'ator <br /> <br />Cib' Council/April 3, 1989 <br /> Page 7 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.