Laserfiche WebLink
Mir. Ra:~tikk~, stated thc: <br /> <br />Thc total right-of-way for Ute S~ee: consists of 30 tcu:. 1:- Utc Swec: were w Dc up~radvd, <br />~he ri~hbof-w~,y should be <br />24 foot riding suNace and a I ioo', bem~ on each side. Thc pu~ost in cons=uztm~ ~he road <br />26 feet wide versus 2t4 feet would <br />accordanc~ with the City's cuxem assessmem policy, the improvements wouid ~ assessed <br />~o the benefiuing property owners. ~e total estimated cos~ for the pr~icc~ i~ $26,500. Tht <br />number of units to be assessed is 10. Tt~e estimated cost per unit is SniP)0 or $~5 per uni~ <br />amortized over l0 years. Mr. Raatikka thin made a slide presentation of Ute S~eet in it's <br />existing condition and others streeu: indicative of what would ae proposM for Ute Sweet. <br />Mr. Raatikka stated upgrading Ute S~ee~ as described would require acquiring anothe: 10 <br />feet of righbof-way on each side of the road. Drainape improvements would have ~o be <br />studied mort cz~efullv in a fcasibiliw report. <br /> <br /> . CllS..U sse,.,. <br />,,'x. rcsidem inquired as ~o why ,~-'"" <br /> up~.,aam~_ Utc Street is bzinu "" "~ <br /> <br />Linda \\'olf[xm,cr 49-17 ]70th L:mc Statec thc: upon her refluts:. Louncn requcs:cd ~: <br />prcliminmD' study regarding upgr::~ing Crc Sweet. Utc Swee: in i:'s present condition has <br />been a consumt problem, source of im:ation and presents some safety concerns. There are <br />drainage eroblems in the ~ .... and ';" <br /> , ~, m~ road is no~ equally shared by resiaents on both sides <br />of the su'eet. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that in order for this project to 'oroceed any further, the affected <br />residents would have to submit a petition to City Council requesting a feasibility study be <br />prepared regarding up~ading Ute Street. <br /> <br />Lois Hanson - 18026 Ute Street - Inquired if Utc Street could be just up~aded to a Class 5 <br />surface. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka replied that it is possible to just bring Ute Street up to Class 5 standards bm <br />without the construction of ditches, there will still be washouts in the area. Up~ading to <br />Class 5 would also be assessed to the benefitting property owners. <br /> <br />Jeff Rockow- 180!5 Ute Street - Stated that he doubts even '&,.,~ construction of ditches will <br />alleviate drainage problems in the area. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka replied that a feasibility report would study the dr~,2nage '-' <br /> ],: the area. <br /> <br />Ron Nelson - 18055 Ute Street - Inquired if the turn-aroud would also be expanded. <br /> <br />Mr. Raat' 'tkka replied that the turn-around would be expanded to at least 60 feet in diameter. <br /> <br />Angela Lenarz - 4925 179th Lane - Stated that her property always getls flooded with oil <br />and it isn't fair. <br /> <br />Linda Wolfbauer - Noted that the residents on the west side of Ute are akeady subject to a <br /> <br />Ci~, Council/August 15, 1989 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />