My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 09/14/1989
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1989
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 09/14/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 10:15:55 AM
Creation date
11/19/2003 3:18:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
09/14/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Angle Lenarz - Stated tl~:;: ti~c roa;:, shoulc' have i~?en propcriy aligned when t}~e arck w;:s <br />developed with homes. There hav~: l)eeri problems associated with nec ien:c aiignmcn: <br />over thc years: a sup'ex,or checked three wcck~, ago and o?temnncd thz: ~cr lcd,cc iy, all (>~, <br />her property; if Utc ~> imprrwed the fence would have ~o ~gain be moved: area dnSnapc <br />runs to her property at,d consm~ction of ditches will increase tirol problem. <br /> <br />Dick Giddings - 18(/(;. Uk Street - Stated that it apDcar,~: that Mt. kaatikka is proposing <br />con~ol the drainage 'at g~age' which woui~ require raising thc elevation et' the road c~uite <br />bit. Stated Iha~ hc sympathizes with thc~se having water proDiems bm hc would ius'. <br />soon leave Utc Street in i~'s existing condition. <br /> <br />.left Roe,kew - Stated that he ciocs h:,,vc drainage problems bu..', i; doesn't bother him mutt:: <br />if Ulc is upgrad~'d, hc does wan: to {:nrta what will Nc dc>nc IO sro7 th:- w;:lcr from coming <br />uv in~c, hi~ e7i','cwav, lnc~uirc~ i:s,, ~,,,,,,t~.~..;' ,~ couid t}~c' n~"i,io'-t ..... sr~e:~;-',, ',.t ....... ~ ..... ~4'n,=~,. ~, c~::s:-~' ~ <br /> <br />M,::x'or. I<eimann replic, d thai ti~- pc. tirion c,ouid spec'ify whatever improvements thc residcmts <br />des/re. <br /> <br />Linda Wolfbauer - Inquired if the petition implies that the residents agree to the <br />imp.'ovemen; pro. iect. <br /> <br />5~-. Raatikka explained mat a petition from at least .35% of the benefitting property owners <br />is required in order for the City to prepare a feasibility stud>'; upon completion of the s~udy, <br />a public hearing is conducted; following the hearing, City Council makes a decision to <br />approve or den',' the pr~ect; if the project is approved, the residents have a 60 da,,: time <br />frame in which they have the option to take no action and accept the project or petition <br />against the project; if over 50% of the benefitting property owners petition against it. the <br />project ri'mst be stopped. <br /> <br />Linda Wolfi>auer - Inquired if the City could do anvthina abou; complaints of cL,'a~na_oe <br />problems in the area if the residents vote down the prqiect. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann replied that accordina to the City Charter, the majo~dty rule and the City <br />would not be able to make drainage improvements in the area if the residents voted it down. <br />However, the City can override the Charter for reasons of health and welfare. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartlev noted that it is a difficult proc. ess to override the Charter. <br /> <br />Duane Holmes - 180-45 \Va:.o Street - Noted that all that exists for r/ght-of-way is 33 feet <br />and it is all dedicated by the property owners on the west side of the road: inquired if the <br />residents on the east side wouid be 6edicating the additional 20 feet of right-of-way needed <br />to up,adc Ute Street. <br /> <br />City Council/August 15, !989 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.