Laserfiche WebLink
9. That the City Council denied an application for a Minor Subdivision of the property in 1988, <br /> based on the lack of public road access. <br /> <br />10. That the City Council denied an application for a Minor Subdivision of the property in 1999, <br /> based on the lack of public road access. <br /> <br />11. That the Applicants are not proposing to extend an improved and dedicated public street into the <br /> property at this time. <br /> <br />12. That if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br /> property. <br /> <br />13. That if granted, the variance will not have the effect of allowing a use that is prohibited in the <br /> applicable zoning district. <br /> <br />14. That if granted, the variance will not impair established property values within the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> <br />15. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably increase the congestion in the public street. <br /> <br />16. That if granted, the variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. <br /> <br />17. That if granted, the variance will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />18. That, if granted, the variance will not grant the Applicant any special privileges that are denied <br /> to other owners of land in the same district. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member <br />Brauer, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt <br />Board Member Johnson <br />Board Member Brauer <br />Board Member Shepherd <br />Board Member Van Scoy <br />Board Watson <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #03-10-268 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />