09/13/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

~,,., ~s~,~ to .,,, and thc' road cons[ruc~ca feet wide with i: thc rigii~-of-w:!5 shouid b: ...... --',' .... ~" fe'c~ ' ' 26 24 foo~ ridinf su<acc anS; i fool bcm~ on each side. Thc pu~ose in- -,- ~,' . ~ons~ U~lng the road 26 fee: wide versus 28 iee~ would m to avoid having to remove mature =ees. in the area. in accordance with the Ci~x"s cu~em ass:ssmem policy, thc improvements would ~ assessed to the benefitting property owners. The rata! esfimat~ cost for the projec~ is $26,YO. The number of units to be assessed is 10. The eshmated cost per unff is $2~K~ or $~5 per unit amortized o,'cr 10 yc~s. ,,~. Raatikt:a ~en made a slide presentation of Ute Sweet in it's existing condition and others sh-eets indicative of what would be proposed for Ute S=eet. Mr. Raatikka stated up~ading Ute S=eet as descried would require acquiring another 10 feet of righ~-of-v,'av on -aoh side of the road. ~' '~ · 7~ , . ~ ~, D,m ~a_.~ improvements would have ~o be studied more carefulh' in a feasibility report. ~,t~. Street is being discussed. A rcsidcn:, inquired as to wh\' up~ading ~ '~ Linde Wolff\mcr - 4947 ]79th Lane - Stated that upon her request, Council requested a preliminary stud5' regarding up~ading Ute Street. Ute Street in it's present condition has been a constanI problem, source of imtatJon and presents some safety concerns. There are drainage problems ir. the ~'-ez and the road is no: equally shared by residents on both sides of the street. Mr. F-'.aatikka stated that in order for this project to proceed an,,' further, the affected residents would have. to submit a petition to City Council requesting a feasibility study be preparzd reg~ding up~ading Ute Street. Lois Hanson - ] 8026 Ute Street - Inquired if Ute Street could ~ just upgraded to a Class 5 surface. Mr. Raatikka replied that it is possible to just bring Ute Street up to Class 5 standards but without the construction of ditches, there will still be washouts in the area. Up~ading to Class 5 would also be assessed to the benefitting property owners. Jeff Rockow - 18015 Ute .Sa'cee - Stated that he doubts even the construction of ditches will alleviate drainage problems in the area. Mr. Raatildca replied that a feasibility report would study the drainage in the area. Ron Nelson - 18055 Ute Street - Inquired if the turn-aroud would also be expanded. Mr. Raatitdca replied that the turn-around would be expanded to at least 60 feet in diameter. Angela Lenarz - 4925 179th Lane - Stated that her property always getls flooded with oil and it isn't fair. Linda Wolfbauer - Noted that the residents on the west side of Ute are already subject to a City Council/August 15, 1989 Page 3 of 8