|
~ ~.~...~ .. ....... [.*'~._:. ~ ,,~1: t,,,. ....... .~r'. ~-. .'', .... ..... ~- V 1[: -J~G'k~[['J];.'t .... ,:_. V/alI" [t['.'[i[ii,,,..,,' '
<br />
<br />AnTle Lena.7 - Stated tha~ ti~c road should have bt?n properiy ali?cd when ti~v :tree
<br />developed x,,iti~ homes. There have bccn problems associated with he," fence alignment
<br />over the .','ears; a sun, evor checked three weeks a? and determined that her fence is all
<br />her property: if Ute is improved the fence would have to a~ain bt moved; ,'u-ca
<br />runs to her property and construction of ditches will increase that problem.
<br />
<br />Dick ©iddJngs - 18001 Utc Street - State4 that it appears that l',4r. Kaatikka is propo:-;ing to
<br />control the drainage 'm ~adc' which would require raising the elevation of the road quite a
<br />bit. Stated that he symp:tthizes wi,,h those having water problems but he would .just as
<br />soon leave Ute Street in it's existing condition.
<br />
<br />Jeff Ro:kov, - Stated tim,, he does have drainage problems but it doesn't bother him much:
<br />if Ute if; tm~aded:.~ . , he does want to know wha~ will be done to stop the water from cominu,
<br />up into n:s ar:vewav. Inquired if submined could me p~,~aor, specify up~adin7 to C,,,ss s
<br />on]x'.
<br />
<br />hi:~x'or Reim:mn replied th:?t Iht' petition could specify ,a'hatever imDrove~,~-n,~' the residcn'.s:
<br />desire.
<br />
<br /> ,n.. the residents ,~_r~ to the
<br />Linda Wolfoauer - Inquired if the petition implies ,' '~, o~ ,~,~
<br />improvement project.
<br />
<br />ML~, RaatiiSca explained that a petition from at least ..,,3 ,c of the benefitting propert?' owners
<br />is required in order for the City to prep~e a feasibility stud,','; upon completion of the stud)',
<br />a public hearing is conducte~t; following the hearing, City Council makes a decision to
<br />approve or den), the project; if the project is approved, the residents have a 60 day time
<br />frame in which they have the option to take no action and accep*, the project or petition
<br />against the project; if over 50~ of the benefitting property owners petition against it, the
<br />pr~ect must be stopped.
<br />
<br />· Linda WolfDauer - Inquired if the City could do anything about complaints of drainage
<br /> problems in the area if the residents vote down the prqiect.
<br />
<br />Mayor Reimann replied that according to the City Charter, the majority rule and the City
<br />would not ~ able to make drainage improvements in, the area if the residents voted it down.
<br />However, the Ciu, can override the Charter for reasons of health and welfare.
<br />
<br />iX~. Hartlev noted that it is a difficult process to override thc Charter.
<br />
<br />Duane Holmes - 18045 Waco Street - Noted that all that exists for right-of-way is 33 feet
<br />and it is all dedicated by the property owners on the west side of the road; inquired if the
<br />residents on the east side would be dedicating the additional 20 feet of right-of-way needed
<br />to upFade Ute Street.
<br />
<br />Cib, Council/August 15, 1989
<br /> Page 4 of 8
<br />
<br />
<br />
|