Laserfiche WebLink
That the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ("MPCA") is the <br />State's regulating agency and is responsible for the regulations <br />and enforcement of the State laws and regulations regarding waste <br />tire processing, solid waste disposal, environmental protection <br />and other aspects of pollution control. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will, at a minimum, be required to obtain <br />and have in effect at all times a waste processing facility permit <br />issued by the MPCA, a facility operating license from Anoka <br />County, and a CUP from the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />10. That a waste tire processing facility is not a permitted use in <br /> the I-1 Industrial District or any other district in the City. <br /> <br />11. That it is WMMI's position that a waste tire processing facility <br /> is a permitted use within the industrial district and that a CUP <br /> is not required. <br /> <br />12. That the property adjacent to the Parcel of Record to the east, <br /> west and north is zoned R-IR residential and to the south is zoned <br /> I-1 Industrial. <br /> <br />13. That approximately 23 residential dwellings abutt the Parcel of <br /> Record on the west and north boundaries. WFiMI owns 13 of these <br /> residences. <br /> <br />14. That the actual site for the waste tire processing facilitz within <br /> the Parcel of Record is proposed to be a distance of at least <br /> 1000 feet from the closest residences to the east, west and north. <br /> <br />15. That the site of the proposed waste tire processing facility is <br /> within 300 feet of the proposed ski hill for which the City <br /> granted a CUP on November 15, 1988. <br /> <br />16. That the proposed use of the land for waste tire processing is <br /> similar to the existing landfill use and recycling operations <br /> whick is the use of the property onthe Parcel of Record and of the <br /> property adjacent to and south of the Parcel of Record. <br /> <br />17. That no other similar use exists within the City. <br /> <br />18. That the proposed shredder described in attached Exhibit "C" and <br /> incorporated herein by reference purports that noise levels are <br /> well within OSHA standards. <br /> <br />19. That the site plan submitted by h~I dated November, 1988 does not <br /> show any landscape screening proposed between the tire processing <br /> facility and the previously approved ski hill operation. <br /> <br />20. That WF~I has outlined in the attached Exhibit C general emergency <br /> procedures in the event of fire, police and medical emergencies. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />