Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR ADOPTION OF EAW FINDINGS OF FACT AND ISSUING NEGA~. <br /> DECLARATION FOR NEED OF ElS ON CHESTNUT ttlLLS ADDITION <br /> By: Mark S. Banwart~ Community Development Director <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />On November 16, 1988, City Staff recommended to City Council that an Envirv, <br />Assessment Worksheet (EAW) be ordered for Cedar Hills Addition, Chestnut Hills Addil <br />Windemere Woods Addition whenever the City received the sketch plan for Chestn~ <br />Addition. On January 3, 1989, the Planning and Zoning Commission passed a nit <br />recommend to City Council a request to order an EAW for the three (3) developments. On ~ <br />10, 1989, the City Council ordered the preparation of an EAW for the three proposed develol <br />Pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410 Environmental Review; the City as the responsible gore <br />unit submitted the three EAVFs for review. The agencies that have reviewed the EAW's ~ ~ <br /> <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />9, <br />10. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />Department of Public Service <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />Pollution Control Agency <br />Mn/DOT <br />Minnesota Health Department <br />Minnesota Agriculture Department <br />Board of Water and Soil Resources <br />Historical Society <br />Legqslative Reference Library <br />Environmental Conservation Library <br />U.S. Army Corp of Engineers <br />U.S. Environmental Protection Agency <br />U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service <br />Metropolitan Council <br />Environmental QualiW Board <br /> <br />The notice of the EAW availability was published in the E@B Monitor on March 6, 1989. Th <br />(30) day comment period expired on April 5, 1989. A number of written responses were <br />and have been addressed in the Findings of Fact. For your information, the following itc~ <br />enclosed: <br /> <br />EAW Findings of Fact for Chestnut Hills Addition <br />Proposed Resolution <br /> <br />Recomxnen clarions: <br /> <br />Staff Recommends acceptance of EAW Findings of Fact and ~ssuing a negative deciarat; <br />need of EIS on Chestnut Hills Addition. <br /> <br />Court cfi Act] on: <br /> <br />Motion to approve/deny EAW Findings of Fact and issuing of negative aeclara~:on for'need <br />on Chestnut Hills Addition. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />City A~torney <br />City En~neer <br />Community Development Director <br /> <br />Chief of Police <br />Finance O~cer <br />Planning & Zoning Comm. <br /> <br /> <br />