Agenda - Council - 06/13/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CASE R.EVIEW HORSE ORDINANCE BS; M~xrk F~ Banwart, Comm,,nlt~' Development Director Backffro~_md: On February 22, 1989 at a special joint meeting of the City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission and the Park and Recreation Commission, Commissioner Shumway reviewed in detail the proposed amendment to the Horse Ordinance that was denied by City Council in 1988. At the City Council meeting of March 14, 1989, City Council directed staff to provide further information regarding amendments to the current Horse Ordinance to be presented at the March 28, 1989 Council meeting. For your information, attached is the following: Existing Horse Ordinance Draft Horse Ordinance Requiring Revision Observations: During the joint meeting of February 22, 1989, a number of concerns were stated by the Commissioners and Council present. These included: Commissioner Hetland felt that the manure controls proposed by the saddle club were more specific and should replace those proposed in the draft ordinance. Some concerns were expressed regarding the enforceability of the ordinance. The City Attorney stated that the horse ordinance would be enforced similar to a nuisance ordinance; for which violation is a misdemeanor. City Attorney Goodrich also stated that courts were not set up to impound horses and that a Horseman's Committee as proposed in the draft ordinance could only be an advisow body to the City Council. It was also noted that animal o~ers are liable for damages caused by their animals and a discussion ensued regarding if current insurance should be something that the CiW require of horse c~ers. It was also stated that the Horseman's Committee would be required to maintain minutes pursuant to State Statute for any legally formed entity ~-ithin the City. Councilmembers DeLuca and Pearson expressed concern with reducing the acreage requirements for keeping horses. The consensus of the Planning and Zoning Commission members present were to make modifications to the proposed horse ordinance before placing it on the City Council agenda for reconsideration. On April 4, 1989, the Planning and Zoning Commission directed Commissioner Terry ~endriksen to make a presentation to City Council. On April 25, 1989, the itamsey City Council heard a presentation of Commissioner Terry Hendriksen. The Council consensus was that the initial acreage increment should remain at 3 acres. Counciimember DeLuca was of the opinion that no horses should be allowed on less than 3 acres South of the 1Vi~VCC boundary. Council consensus was to place the horse ordinance review on the May 9 Com-~cil agenda for fu~her discussion.