Agenda - Council - 06/27/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

waived by Council, the developer must deposit a sufficient amount of money with the CiD' to cover the cost of street paving in the future. City Staff is recommending that the paving of Coquina Stre"t be included in the development agreement for O~ Run. If Council does require the paving, the cost per unit would be based on thc number of benefining properties and current residents along Coquina would be assessed for their fair share of the benefit. Frank Villeneuve -lnquired as to access for Lots 5 and 6. Mr. Caine replied that Lots 5 an5 6 would have a common access onto Nowthen Blvd. Deanna Heaton - 16531 Coquina Street - Inquired as to 'a,hm the procedure would be to get Coouina paved if Council waives the paving requirement for Oak Run. Mr. Ban,a':a-I replied that the residrms would have to petition the City for s:reet improvements. Dwight Goof - 6630 165th Lane - Note5 that Lot 2, Block 1, Ga3: Run, is a low lot; he lives adjacent to this lot; if the developer adds £fll to the lot, it will impact proper d~minage of his lot. Chairman Zimmerman noted that street ~ades and drainage plans for plats must be approved by the City Engineer. l~'s. Gerald Root - 16208 Coquina Street - Inquired as to the price range of homes proposed to be built in Oak Run. M.r. Gerald Bauer stated that there is no restrictive covenants proposed for Oak Run; the style of home built will be the decision of the buyer of the lot; the City does have minimum house size standards; the homes built will most lit:ely be comp~.,-abie ,.o or barter than the homes exisfin~ in the area. Bob Loscheider - 16531 Dolomite Stree: - Stated that there are sa.feD, problems in the area that need to be addressed; many persons speed when traveling Coquina; can, the residents petition Ci~' Council for stop sigms to siow down traffic? Chairman 7__.fimmerman stated that signage and spe~ control is ~ issue the residents would have to discuss wiff..CiD' Council and the PoEce Dzpm~anen:. Bob Loscheider Stated nhat ,' - v~n~, ~ Lots 5 v..nd 6 are proposed to access Nowthen Bh'd. is a dangerous cu:'ve; P,m,,m, an5 Zoning has denied access to Now~en Bb,,cl. in the past because of the votenrial '- . c~n_~..i~ this parficulaz Chairman Zimmemaan noted that the authohD' for access onto Nowthen Blvd. comes from Anoka Co'ann' and kn *2his case they ''''~ ',~ ~ ' ,..~ ~ approved a conmmon agces.- ;or Lots 5 and 6. Rand)' Noon - 670'0 165th Lane - Stated that vehicles entering No~-~hen Blvd. n-om the Planning and Zoning .~ ut)lie Hea.,nnD~4arch 7, 1989 Pa~e ' ~' ~