|
concerning screening an':. blacldop sudacing thr' arc'-3 as lar bask as the rea, c' tn(. parkin~o
<br />area, with siding that is compatible with the exist:n~ structure.
<br />
<br />Motion carried Voting Yes: Chai'man Zimmerman, Commissioners Shumw~y, 'Terry, L~,._ue
<br />and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. Absent: None.
<br />
<br />Case ¢'2: Request to rezone property 1rom I-1 Industria] to B -1 Businesc~; '~c.4~sc of t~r. Tom
<br /> Nurak.
<br />
<br />Mr. Banwad explained thal the request by Mr. Kurak is Icc the rezoning of properly located
<br />north and east of th( imersect;on of Highway 10 and Armstron2 Boule'var~'~ from l-I Industria~
<br />to B-1 Business, which is a higher and best use 1or this propen.v. A pubhc hoc:lng was hel¢
<br />on June 6, 19B9. No written or oral commen'.s were received from ;,ne public.
<br />
<br /> se,.on..e~, by Commissioner LaDue, tr., approve the
<br />Motion by Commissioner Hendriksen, " '~ '"
<br />findings ct ~act. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zir,merman, Commissioners Terry,
<br />LaDue, Hendriksen and Shumway. VotinD Nc: None. Absent: None.
<br />
<br />Motion by Commissioner LaDue, seconded by Commissioner Shumway, to recommend to the
<br />City Council lot approval of the rezoning request submitted by Tom Kurak ~or property,
<br />approximately 25 acres, at the north/east intersection of Highway 10 and Armstrong Boulevard
<br />~rom I-1 Industrial to B-1 Business.
<br />
<br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners LaDue, Hendriksen,
<br />Shumway and Terry. Voting No: None. Absent: None.
<br />
<br />Case ¢.3: Report status of request ~or ConditionaJ Use Permit, to expand Ramsey Aul. o; ce. se
<br /> of Robert and Louis Woicik.
<br />
<br /> ,. ~e,..ues~ and the
<br />Chairman Zimmerman stated that a pubiic hesring w2s held on th
<br />Commission received comments ~rom adjoining prope~' owners. He asked if the entrance
<br />location to Highway 56 has been determined. Mr. 5snws~ explained
<br />Conditional Use P "
<br /> . ermh ~or this prcpe~, indicated there would be an entrance only a~e~..
<br />Currently customers park on Hi~hv,'~v~, ~. 10 o: use the H~ohwav~ . i0 driveway which souses
<br />ccnDestion. He pointed out that signs can be used 1c ia:ilitate be,~e, traffic movement. He
<br />aisc suggested that off-street parking ~e required. The Commission direc:ed staff to veda, the
<br />iosation of the entrance.
<br />
<br />Commissioner Hendriksen stated that there are severs: instances in F, amsey where the
<br />stipulations 1or a Conditional Use Permit are repeated.v ir,wo,:¢o,:,' '~" ~ and it is d;fi,~u,''~, '~ 1or the
<br />Cit~, to enlorce since a good faith effort is not being made by the appiicant.
<br />
<br />Motion by Commissioner Hendriksen, seoonded by Commissioner Ter,'3.', to direct the Ci.~,
<br />Attorney ',~ investig2te wordage that can be adoed to ~,~Jture ~onomo,,al Use Permits which
<br />places a performance bond, deposit, s::)ecia[ assessmenl agatha: the prope,.~,.,, or monitor3.,
<br />insurance in the City's hands to cover expenses incurred for enforcement of the Permit, with
<br />this report coming bei'ore the Commission 1'or their recommends-rich to Councii. This will
<br />
<br />Planning & Zoning Co,,mmission,.'June 12, 1999
<br /> Page 5 of 9
<br />
<br />
<br />
|