Agenda - Council - 06/27/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

10. PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT REQUEST FOR REZONIN(; MR. TOM KURAK That Mr. Tom Kurak, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", has properly applied for a rezoning of the property located noixh and east of the intersection of Hwy. #10 N.W. and Armstrong Blvd. N.V,'. from 1-1 Industrial to B-1 Business. That the Applicant appeared before the Plan;;ing and Zoning Commission for a pubiic hearing pursuam to Section 170.013C of the City Cod,. on June 6, 1989 ,,.nd :ha~ said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hc."eby incorporated by reference. That the property which is the subject of the application is legally described as follows: The West 466.6'? feet of the Northv,,est Quarter of the Northwest Quartet- of Section 28, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka Count)', Minnesota. Except the Norlh 90.00 feet thereof. And, the North 33.00 feet of the West 466.69 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township ''''') '"5, . .~_, Range , Anoka County, Minnesota. And, the South 466.69 feet of the North 499.69 feet of the West 466.69 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka Count),, Minnesota. And, the West 466.69 feet of that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka Count.,.,, Minnesota, lying Northerly of the Burlington Northern Railroad rieht-of-wav. ~ '"~ · ~ . .,_.x,.~p~ the North 499.69 feet thereof. That the subject property is approximately 25 a~es ~ size. · ' 1 That the subject properg., is cu. rrently zoneA I- 1 Inousm.q.'. That the subject property is surrounded by R-1 Rural Residential on the north, I-1 Industrial on the east; I-1 Industrial and B-i Business across Armsn-ong Blvd. to the west; and B-1 Business a~oss Highway #10 to the south. That certain property across A,'Tnstron£ Blvd. to the west was approved for rezoning ~om 7I- l industrial to B-1 Business by the City of R?.msev in 1988. That City S'~f has received verbal indications ~om the public that B-1 Business versus I-1 I. ndusn-ial development is preferred adjacent to Armstrong Blvd. N.W. That no verbal or wrinen citizen opposition to tine r~uest for rezoning -,,,'as submitted a: the public hearing. That the Applicant has stated that the rezoning is necessa.,D, in order to .,cn.,..'~ e the. highest and best use of property located adjacent to a major thoroughfare and a R-! Rural Residential District.