|
CiIv s park aedJca1~or: re. auiremen',s.,.,,,~"'". Attorney Gooanch staled thc: the phrase "Te? p(
<br />(1 0%) o: taJr ma'~-,et value" raises s 131 c' pr,ob;ems. Mayor Reimann StaleC h£ tel: ina:
<br />Cib should charge ~. certain fi×ed figure tot par~, aedication. Commissior,ef HenariKsen stated
<br />that i', tr~6 Cih
<br /> ...)e. v,,~lr. ~ lia~ lee they mai lOSe money Couns. ilmembe: Pelerson slated thc', if
<br />
<br />the City loses ir, on( area they wil: rn, a~.;6 uF m another, Mayor Reimanr, sud.oestec accepting a
<br />fla~ tee- lar par~, oed~calion inslea¢ o'. lhe "'Fen ,~ "'
<br /> p~r~en, (1nc'"' or
<br /> . ,. ,o~ fair markel value". The
<br />majorlly o~ every'..;:~e present was ir-, adreemen', with lb(- Mayor. Cily Attorne) Goo~,'~,?,h
<br />suggesled that th~s subjec: be resolve~5 by the Ci!y Council. The genera! ~nsensus of thcs6 ir
<br />attendance agreed wiln the Cib' Attorney's suggestion.
<br />
<br />On June 13, 19£S, the Ramsey Otb.' Counci', reviewed a dral~ park dedication ordinance. The
<br />City's Consullant, Merland Ollo, presenled ~ number of issues tolhe City Council. 'The firsl
<br />issue was whether the land dedicalion should be lurlher reduced Irom seven percen~ (7%) to
<br />five percenl (5%) i'. ~our in lorry zoning is implemenled. Th(: City Council consensus was lhal
<br />land dedication should remain ai seven percent (7%) wilh no credit given upon iu~ure
<br />resubdivision because park dedication is basec or; density. Mr. Cite noted tnal F.U.D.'s ar6
<br />exempl from park dedication requirements as long as a minimum el Twenly percenl (20%) of
<br />the land is available tot privale open space or recreational use. The City Council consensus was
<br />lhal P.U,D.'s should pd.-licipate in ~he public park system and directed staff to redrafl the P.U.D.
<br />ordinance accordingly. Council also delermined thc! park dedication requirements should be
<br />tulfilled al 1he time of final pla~ approval. In addifior, the Council consensus was that
<br />subdividers would be required Io make basic park improvements with no credit given unless the
<br />subdivider construcled ~ segmenl o~ a multi-use trai', syslem. The subdividers would no', be
<br />required to construc~ an), portion of the Mississipp! Trail Corridor as it is inlended to be a
<br />Counly owned and operated system. Mr. Otto stated that the drat Dark dedication purposes that
<br />park dedication resubdivision of lots within the MUSA would be Five Hundred Dollars
<br />($500.00) per dweliing unit ralher than the Ten percent (10%) of fair market value of the
<br />new lo', being crealed. Council agreed with requiring Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) per
<br />dwelling unil for resubdivision of lots in the MUSA area.
<br />
<br /> , 00
<br />On June 27 1.,8,,, the Ramsey City Council introduced the Park and Open Spac.s dedication
<br />ordinance.
<br />
<br />On Jul.,,' 11, '~ 989. lh6 Ramsey City Council' "¢'
<br /> , . ,am~c ~he adoption of the Park Dedication Ordinance
<br />unlil a finai version of the Ordinance could b£. reviewed by both the Ramsey Park and Recreation
<br />Commission and the Ramsey Planning and Zoni,ns Commission.
<br />
<br /> -'- ~ c~c the Ramsey Park and -,=,"'- -*' '-
<br />On July ~. , .... m~,e¢.,~o,, Commission " ~ ~ '~
<br /> re~omm~n,.,e,, adoption of the
<br />proposed Park Dedicz'.ior, Ordinance.
<br />
<br />On July 1£, 1989, the Ramsey Planning and Zoning Commission tabled their review of the
<br />proposed Park Dedication Ordinance.
<br />
<br />On August 1, i¢,.~,c~c the Ramsev. Ptannino_ and Zonino_ Commission recommended that Ct'i), Council
<br />adopt Section i. Amendment. Chapter 170.06 of the City Code: Park and Open Space Dedication.
<br />
<br />The Ramsey Planning and Zoning Commission aiso recommended that the park dedication fee
<br />formula in Ordinance #83-13 be adjusled to set park dedication fees at .0055;, rather than
<br />.00255;, of the building value. The City A~lorney has indicated that since the Development
<br />
<br />
<br />
|