Agenda - Council - 12/19/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT REZON1NG CARR ADDITION R-1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) 12/08/89 That Irv Can', hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", has properly applied for a rezoning of Carr Addition from R- 1 Rural Residential to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.). That the Applicant appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission for a public hearing pursuant to Sections 170.013C and 170.016K of the City Code on December 5, 1989 and that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated by reference. That the property, which is proposed to be named Carr Addition, is legally described as follows: The Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota and The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota. That the subject property is 245 acres in size. That the subject property is currently zoned R-1 Rural Residential. That the subject property is surrounded by R-1 Rural Residential zoning. That Section 170.016K of the Ramsey City Code states that the intent of a Planned Unit Development is to preserve desirable land characteristics and open space and to protect sensitive environmental features such as steep slopes, poor soils and trees. That Section 170.016K of the Ramsey City Code states that a Planned Unit Development shall provide a minimum of twenty percent (20%) for private or public open space air recreational uses. That the subject plat contains property that the City is interested in accumulating for it's nmlti-use trail system. That the preliminary site plan for Can' Addition indicates that approximately 50% of the land will be preserved for park and open space. That the preliminary site plan proposed by the developer indicates a proposal to develop Carr Addition with 72 single family residential lots at least one acre in size and at an average density of 1 lot per 3.4 acres. That the proposed preliminary site plan was not acceptable as presented but was recommended for City Council approval contingent upon an additional review by the Planning and Zoning Conm'fission for recommended changes prior to final plat approval.