Laserfiche WebLink
_.Setbacks: The Town Center Zoning Code has a maximum setback of 20 feet for residential <br /> units. It appears that approximately 64 of the units have a front yard setback greater than the <br /> allowable 20 feet. The plat needs to be changed to reflect the required setbacks. <br /> <br />Driveway £en,gths: An additional concern that the City has is the length of the driveway. <br />Typically developments such as the one being proposed require a driveway length of 25 feet in <br />order to accommodate guests and larger vehicles. It appears that nearly all of the townhome units <br />do not have driveways that are 25 feet in length. (Avg. length appears to be 21 feet). All of the <br />condominium units, however, exceed the minimum driveway length. Although the Town Center <br />Zoning Code does not specifically call out minimum driveway lengths, Section 9.20.25.11 of the <br />Town Center Zoning District allows for the City to utilize other parts of City Code when <br />provisions contained elsewhere are better suited to address a certain aspect of the development. <br />City Staff finds this to be the case in regards .to driveway length. <br /> <br />.Public/Private Streets: The development is proposed of mainly private streets. Staff has some <br />concern with all of the private streets shown in the sketch plan, especially the width of the private <br />streets. The City would also like to see a public road traverse through the development. Staff <br />will be discussing these items with the applicant to review alternatives in development layout in <br />order to make the use and width of private streets more consistent with Past practices. <br /> <br />A detailed drainage, grading, and utility plan will be addressed during the preliminary plat <br />process. The project is subject to the review and permitting process of the Lower Rum River <br />Watershed Management Organization (WMO), <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Staff will be discussing the issues raised in the Staff Review letter with the applicant prior to the <br />Planning Commission meeting. It is hoped that many of the issues can be resolved prior to the <br />meeting and Staff will give the Commission an update. Staff, however, does not want to slow <br />the project down unnecessarily. As long as the issues raised by City Staff are addressed, Staff <br />would recommend directing the developer to the preliminary plat stage. <br /> <br />Commission Action:' <br /> <br />Motion to approve/deny the sketch plan of Ramsey Town Center 2nd Addition contingent upon. <br />compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated November 26, 2003. <br /> <br />PC: 12/04/03 <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br />Community Development Director <br />Associate Planner <br />City Engineer(s) <br /> <br />Copies to: <br />City Administrator <br />Public Works Director <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />