Laserfiche WebLink
for the City Council. Mr. Field stated these are his comments based on the information that was <br />provided to him. He stated he opposed the franchise fee and urged the Council to do the same. <br />Darrel Smithwick, 8353 168th Lane NW, commended the Council for addressing the need for a <br />solution to fund the road projects. He felt the projections were aggressive with 174 miles of <br />streets, many of which are short and not heavily traveled so they will require less maintenance. <br />He noted that if this is approved, staff recommends that every street be seal coated every three <br />years and then overlaid but he thinks that not every street will require that scheduled <br />maintenance. Mr. Smithwick stated he thinks the projected rates are really high. He agreed the <br />flat tax is not the right way to go and asked what the utilities will charge for handling these fees. <br />Mr. Smithwick stated instead of a scheduled maintenance every three or six years, it should be <br />based on PASER. <br />Richard Cich, 6440 170th Avenue NW, stated this fee is another fee for government to be wild <br />on. He questioned the real level of transparency and stated there needs to be taxes so they can <br />pay the federal government and midgets in St. Paul. <br />Randy Villa, 15125 Garnet Street NW, stated all he has heard is about raising taxes or fees and <br />nothing was offered on cutting the budget, reducing projects, and improving infrastructure. He <br />stated it was known there would come a day when roads would have to be improved or <br />maintained but it has been ignored. He felt that once imposed, it has to be paid so the "reliable <br />source" being mentioned by staff is actually the resident who has to pay it. Mr. Villa stated he is <br />adamantly opposed to franchise fees, noting he has not had a raise since the recession while all of <br />his other costs have gone up. He felt it would price residents out of existence, the Council <br />should start by cutting the budget, and stated he supported the comments made by Mr. Field. <br />Jennifer Carlson, 7540 163rd Lane NW, asked the Council to consider what happens if through <br />the franchise fees, there is excess revenue, as the Council is trusted to be fiscally conservative. <br />She also asked what happens if there is a budget shortfall and costs are higher than projected, and <br />how cities not using franchise fees fund road repairs. <br />Eric Zaetsch, 6521 154th Avenue NW, stated he agrees with what Mary Jo Olson suggested to <br />tier the fees instead of having a flat fee that stings the poor more than the rich. He also supports <br />what Mr. Field stated. Mr. Zaetsch asked how amenable the Council would be if the Charter <br />Commission puts forward an amendment. <br />Matt Look, 5635 142nd Avenue NW, stated he recalls being in a similar situation with a packed <br />Council Chambers, which can be intimidating. He commented on the support of a past Public <br />Works Director for a $20 million Public Works Station that did not get traction but if it had, <br />there would be a $20 million Public Works debt service plus roads. He stated at that time, the <br />City never heard anything about the impending catastrophe with roads but maybe that was <br />because there was a competing interest. Mr. Look stated he noticed a lot of attention in Town <br />Center with MSA dollars on Sunwood Drive and that the MSA funds were spent in advance. He <br />stated this Municipal Center was built with belief there would be "wheelbarrows of cash" <br />coming from the Ramsey Town Center, but it did not come to that point. Mr. Look stated at <br />some point it will come, but the economy has not responded. He stated the Council says there is <br />City Council / October 8, 2013 <br />Page 13 of 24 <br />