My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/22/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 10/22/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:39:28 AM
Creation date
10/23/2013 8:22:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/22/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
not enough money for roads but is still considering hiring so there is some money. He stated he <br />is a prior Councilmember and the emphasis was to cut taxes because the economy was dipping. <br />Mr. Look supported the Council looking at staffing levels, which are 70% of the budget, even if <br />services are not as efficient. He noted that if the average house pays $600 for the City tax <br />portion, adding $200 in franchise fees is an onerous addition, an increase of 30-33%. He stated <br />while campaigning he found situations of two -parent and single -parent unemployment resulting <br />in a level of uncertainty where it becomes an issue of feeding their families and keeping their <br />house, not a matter of what sports their children will play. Also, there are many foreclosed <br />homes because of the difficult economy. Mr. Look stated he felt fortunate he had not gone <br />through those financial concerns but thinks a $200 increase is significant. He stated there has <br />been discussion of "leaders versus politicians" and that leaders make difficult decisions but <br />elective government represents residents and he does not think this direction represents his <br />personal view. Mr. Look suggested that if there is public support, put it on the ballot and ask <br />residents if they support paying $200 a year for roads. <br />Jim Bendtsen, 14131 Junkite Street NW, asked if the City will receive a large amount of money <br />from TIF coming off line plus LGA. He asked if that total was more than $800,000 a year and if <br />it is planned to be spent and what on. <br />Grant Rademacher, 15920 St. Andrews Lane, stated he hopes to be rich some day and it baffles <br />him to hear comments about "taxing the rich more than me." He stated he has been a Ramsey <br />resident for many years and a franchise fee is a fee and should be called a fee. Mr. Rademacher <br />stated he pays water and sewer rates for a business in Ramsey that is twice what he pays in <br />Andover or in Brooklyn Park and it is all money out of the pockets of residents. He stated the <br />Council was voted to do the job, to be honest, and to do what is best. With regard to picking <br />battles, he noted all were sitting at a "Taj Mahal," which is crazy, and he wished he had a steady <br />pool of income but many are out of funds, are putting off vacations, projects, their children's <br />college funds, and there is not a lot left at the end of the day. Mr. Rademacher stated the City is <br />now adding more taxes. Mr. Rademacher stated he is firmly against this. <br />Vicky Hesselgrave, 7601 166th Avenue NW, stated good points have been made relating to <br />housing without gas service or those that use wood and if they would receive a break with <br />franchise fees in only paying half or not at all. She stated Elk River was said to have a franchise <br />fee and she knows residents who are disappointed in the outcome of their franchise fee and there <br />was also a recent article in the newspaper about that. She asked the City Council to do more <br />research and to listen to the people. Ms. Hesselgrave stated Ramsey has been fairly okay over <br />the years in listening to the people and she appreciates that. She stated the City already bills for <br />utilities and asked why a franchise fee was chosen instead of charging a fee through that means. <br />With regard to property owners who cannot afford to pay their utility bills, she asked what <br />happens to that fee and who is paid to collect it. Ms. Hesselgrave asked the Council to listen to <br />all of the input and come away with a better solution. <br />Todd Embury, 9041 159th Lane NW, stated he came without an opinion or fully understanding <br />the concept. He stated he has sympathy for the Council as they are taking "a lot of heat" but they <br />have to listen to resident feedback. Mr. Embury stated no one likes taxes and no one will vote to <br />increase taxes, if given the choice. He stated Ramsey needs first class roads and the staff gave a <br />City Council / October 8, 2013 <br />Page 14 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.