Laserfiche WebLink
good presentation. He stated one impact is sprinkler systems that spray onto the roads and <br />causes destruction. Mr. Embury stated the streets need repair and a steady funding source, which <br />may be the residents, but it is needed. He stated when he leaves his cul-de-sac, he needs to use <br />the main thoroughfare and several years ago those who live on that street raised such a ruckus <br />that they intimidated the Council to not make the improvement so that street is now at a Level 1 <br />or 2 instead of a Level 5. Mr. Embury stated he understands the need for a reliable source of <br />funding but it sounds like a franchise fee may have some downfalls and not a course of funding <br />that is fair to everyone. He indicated he would like to hear more about whether property taxes <br />are a fair funding source. Mr. Embury stated whether it is a property tax or franchise fee, maybe <br />more time is needed for discussion instead of moving forward tonight. <br />David Elvig, 18026 Ute Street NW, stated he appreciates the Council is taking on this issue and <br />listening to comments. He stated in his experience as a former Councilmember and wrangling <br />the issue, if funded by the General Fund, there is not as much control in where it is spent. But, if <br />a franchise fee, the use of the funds is locked. His concern is management of the funds so it is <br />not commingled and invested only in infrastructure. Mr. Elvig suggested the ordinance define <br />"repair" and "reconstruction" as being for existing infrastructure and not for a developer. He <br />supported the ordinance indicating no loans, interfund loans, pet projects, or no fees that <br />artificially bolster the general fund. Mr. Elvig stated proper management is his concern and he <br />likes the franchise fee because it can be isolated and transparent. He also supports the sunset <br />provision, noting that the past franchise fee had a sunset and when the goal was met, the <br />franchise fee was removed. A franchise fee is not a long-term assessment on property taxes that <br />continue into perpetuity and that is the problem with funding by property taxes. Mr. Elvig stated <br />the ordinance language does not include a soft sunset. He felt five years may not be long enough <br />and may need to be ten years, but a term should be set. Mr. Elvig stated if there is a change or <br />loans, the issue needs to come back for public input to assure proper management of the funds. <br />He stated the City spent about $30,000 on a survey of several hundred randomly selected <br />residents who were called and the vast majority said a franchise fee makes sense to them as <br />opposed to other mechanisms. Mr. Elvig stated Ute Street was reconstructed so he had a $5,000 <br />assessment and is paying $500 per year as opposed to $200 per year he would pay through a <br />franchise fee. Mr. Elvig stated he would prefer paying the $200 per year. <br />Wayne Buchholz, 14621 Neon Street NW, stated Mr. Elvig raised fine points but the poorest of <br />the poor pay for this no matter how you cut it and that is wrong. <br />Dennis Olson, 8260 159th Lane NW, stated the people voted for the Council and he believes the <br />Council would not do anything that residents would not support. He stated residents want the <br />roads fixed and the Council has the ability and knowledge of what to do. Otherwise, the roads <br />will be crumbling and residents will say they want them fixed. Mr. Olson stated he feels sorry <br />for the Council having to take this input when it is doing its job as best as they know how. He <br />stated Ramsey's taxes are lower than others and while no one likes bills, the franchise fee is <br />small. Mr. Olson stated Minneapolis does not maintain its streets and the potholes are large. He <br />stated all want businesses in Ramsey and it would be nice to attract big businesses, which pay a <br />very high tax, to lower resident's taxes but big businesses want good infrastructure. Mr. Olson <br />stated the City has to maintain its image so it doesn't have problems with crime. That is another <br />reason businesses will want to come to Ramsey, because it is a good and upcoming community. <br />City Council / October 8, 2013 <br />Page 15 of 24 <br />