My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/13/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 08/13/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:36:06 AM
Creation date
10/25/2013 4:02:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/13/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
868
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ramsey, Nowthen, St. Francis, Oak Grove, and Bethel, Minnesota <br />Feasibility Study for Shared or Cooperative Fire and Emergency Services <br />Joint Powers Agreements (JPAs) are not uncommon in Minnesota and can serve as a valuable tool. State <br />statutes authorize two or more municipal corporations to collaborate in exercising any power common <br />to the municipalities and to provide a joint board representing the participating entities and overseeing <br />administrative and management matters. <br />In the case of fire protection for the Ramsey region, the existing contractual arrangements between <br />Ramsey, Nowthen, and St. Francis could be expanded and reconfigured as JPAs to include the Cities of <br />Oak Grove and Bethel, or a new entity could be created to provide oversight and governance to an <br />entity that services the entire region. <br />The advantage of a JPA in this instance is that each entity maintains autonomy regarding taxation and <br />each retains the ability to withdraw from the agreement in the future. As is currently the practice in the <br />study area, each participating entity would levy a tax in its own way and then contribute to the <br />operations of the JPA as outlined in the enabling documents. No legislative approval is required for this <br />type of agreement and the intergovernmental agreements created would define how the JPA was <br />governed as well as how each participant is represented. <br />While the fact that each entity maintains its autonomy can be considered advantageous, it may also be <br />viewed as a drawback. Remaining as separate entities under a JPA, so that any participant can withdraw, <br />lacks a long-term dedicated commitment to the JPA, making future planning and visioning more <br />challenging. <br />A prime example of this type of collaboration is the South Metro Fire Department (SMFD). SMFD <br />(created in 2005) serves South St. Paul and West St. Paul and is the result of a full consolidation of both <br />cities' fire departments. Another example is the Isanti Fire District that includes the City of Isanti and the <br />townships of Athens, Bradford, Isanti, Oxford, Spender Brook, and Standford. In the region, the <br />townships surrounding the City of Isanti felt as though their level of input and control over fire <br />protection was limited by the existing agreement. In order to more equitably distribute control, the JPA <br />was signed by all parties passing control over to a board of representatives rather than the City of Isanti. <br />In most situations where two or more municipalities or quasi -governmental organizations enter into a <br />shared services agreement through a JPA, the governing board consists of representatives from the <br />participating agencies. Under the assumption that a single representative from each participating <br />jurisdiction serves on the board of a newly created JPA, in this study area, the board would consist of <br />Emergency Services :ur, •. Lung <br />,pope 85 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.