My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/12/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 11/12/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:40:01 AM
Creation date
11/15/2013 10:43:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/12/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
495
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Notification: <br />None required. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Staff also evaluated the cost to install a new lining in the existing culvert, rather than replacing it, which would <br />provide needed structural support. However, the cost for materials alone would exceed $20,000, and when factoring <br />in labor the costs to line the culvert would exceed the cost of the lowest quote received for installing a new CMP <br />culvert, even with the needed road repairs. As such, staff does not recommend this option be considered. <br />Staff also evaluated costs to replace the 48" CMP with 48" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) and 48" High Density <br />Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe. The life expectancy of CMP has proven to be about 30 to 40 years, whereas the <br />life -expectancy of RCP has proven to exceed 50 years. The life expectancy of HDPE is estimated to be more than <br />50 years too, but since HDPE has not been in use this long this has yet to be proven. However, based on the <br />condition of HDPE pipe that has been installed for 20 years or so, the general consensus is that the life expectancy <br />of HDPE pipe will be at least 50 years. <br />Below is a table outlining the estimated costs for replacing the 48" CMP culvert with 48" CMP, 48" HDPE, or 48" <br />RCP pipe. Even though the drainage capacity of HDPE and RCP pipes are greater than CMP pipe due to their <br />smooth inside walls, staff does not recommend reducing the pipe diameter because the culvert immediately <br />upstream is a 48" culvert and it is generally not an accepted practice to reduce pipe sizes downstream. The project <br />cost for each pipe type in the last column includes costs for the two flared end sections. And if RCP pipe were to be <br />used, there would be an additional project cost of about $5,000 for additional grading and traffic control <br />requirements due to the shorter pipe lengths. <br />Pipe Size & Estimated Furnish & Install Estimated Furnish & Install Cost for <br />Material Cost per Lineal Foot Project (includes 2 FES's) <br />48" CMP $185 $14,200 <br />48" HDPE $160 $12,500 <br />48" RCP $325 $26,200 <br />Per the estimated costs above, HDPE pipe appears to be the most economical to install while CMP pipe is not far <br />behind. RCP is by far the most expensive. <br />Funding Source: <br />The replacement of this 48" CMP culvert is not identified in the 5-year CIP, and no money was budgeted for this <br />work in 2013, or in 2014. This work is therefore proposed to be paid for through the Stormwater Fund. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends replacing the existing culvert with 48" CMP pipe as soon as possible. <br />Since County Ditch #14 is currently dry and the residential neighborhood north of this culvert crossing has no other <br />access, one lane of traffic must be maintained at all times during the work. If this work is delayed until next <br />spring/summer, the ditch will likely be conveying storm water runoff which would require the water to be pumped <br />through a hose across Vanadium Street, thereby prohibiting or even preventing one lane of traffic from being <br />maintained at all times. Also, considering the small cost savings that could be realized by switching from CMP to <br />HDPE pipe, this savings may not justify the delays associated with switching to HDPE pipe due to completing the <br />required storm water modeling and the potential cost increase associated with ripping through frost if the delays are <br />substantial and/or the weather turns cold quickly. <br />Bituminous plants will be closing soon so the sooner this work can be completed the better the chance is that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.