|
Case
<br />
<br />REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR
<br />CHESTNUT HILLS ADDITION
<br /> By Mark S. Banwart, Community Development Director
<br />
<br />Background:
<br />
<br />The proposed addition is located in the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26,.
<br />Township 32, Range 25, Anoka Count5,, Minnesota, and in portions of Government Lot 3,
<br />Section 26, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota, and a part of the Southwest
<br />Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka Count>',
<br />Minnesota. The proposed subdivision has an area of 56 acres and consists of 102 single-family
<br />urban residential lots. For your information, the following items are enclosed:
<br />
<br />A)
<br />B)
<br />C)
<br />D)
<br />E)
<br />
<br />F)
<br />O)
<br />H)
<br />I)
<br />J)
<br />K)
<br />L)
<br />M)
<br />N)
<br />
<br />Site location map
<br />Proposed subdivision
<br />CiB' Engineers review (December 29, 1988)
<br />Environmental assessment worksheet (February 24, 1989)
<br />Findings of Fact 4~251 Chesmut Hills Environmental assessment worksheet
<br />(April 25, 1989)
<br />City of Ramsey Resolution #89-04-84 (April 25, 1989)
<br />Mn EQB Letter (Ma), 11, 1989)
<br />Public hearing notice
<br />Public hearing notification list
<br />Affidavit of publication
<br />Public Hearing Minutes
<br />City Engineer's Review (July I7, 1989)
<br />Department of the Army Permit (89-1158-12) (O:.tober 3, 1989)
<br />City Engineer's Review (May 15, 1990)
<br />
<br />Observations:
<br />
<br />On September 15, 1988, the Ramsey Parks and Recreation gave concept approval to a centralized
<br />pa.rk for Windemere Woods, Cedar Hills and Chestnut Hills proposed subdivisions. At the
<br />O::tober 20, 1988 meeting of the Rarnsey Parks and Recreation commission, a motion was made
<br />and carried to deny that portion of land offered by Windemere Woods Addition, Cedar Hills
<br />Addition and Chestnut Hills Addition to satisfy the ciD"s park dedication requirements for the three
<br />proposed subdivisions be:ause a po~on of t~e said pror~ertv is wetland. TheSe '"
<br /> . . a,.veto~.s met
<br />several times with Cin' Staff regarding conce."ns of the sub.4ivision layout (~..., r~arks, n-ails,
<br />n-'an spor'mtion, etc.).
<br />
<br />The developers presented their PARK CONCEPT PLAN to the Ramsey Pm-ks and Recreation
<br />Commission on December 8, 1988, "Fne joint proposal was reviewe, d bv the Pm-ks and Recreation
<br />Commission. The consensus of the Commission was to acceet the overall concern along wflh the
<br />u-ail to the north but not to make a motion for ...... ',, '~ ::"e CommisSion receives the
<br />re. qu'k~..d plats showing the entire area of the three developments, ~ the ~-aJ.! a!i~menu and p~biic
<br />~se areas.
<br />
<br />On Novem~: 15, 1988, the Ramsev City Coun.m :,'-.'":,',~ ':~ ' '
<br /> . . au ..... x~,, 'qO Anderson, deveioeer Cedaz
<br />":~n,,.~ Addition to make .'~v~ .' effor, to n.._o.a..'~ ': '~ mn access for th, So,',;-~s~-'~ ' portion of ma:'
<br />su~ivision to CounD' Road gi 16.
<br />
<br />90
<br />
<br />
<br />
|