Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />ADOPT CITY PARKS MAP <br />By= Merlan~ Otto <br /> <br />Background= .' <br /> <br />The city has been operating without an adopted City parks map for <br />several years. For the past three years, the Parks Commission has <br />been using a City wide trails map to ascertain possible trails and <br />to determine park dedication requirements during the development <br />process. <br /> <br />We have also had the concern expressed to us by developers that it <br />would be helpful if they knew where future park dedication is <br />likely to be required. While trails and large parks can be shown, <br />it is difficult to indicate specific neighborhood parks or tot <br />lots. These are more appropriately located through the development <br />process responding more directly to needs created by the proposed <br />development. <br /> <br />The proposed park map has been discussed at several Park Commission <br />meetings and at a joint meeting on March 21, 1990 with the City <br />Council, Planning and Zoning, Economic Development and Parks <br />Commission. <br /> <br />At the May !0, 1990 Parks Commission meeting the Commission <br />recommended adoption of the City Parks map by the City Council. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />Among the items discussed at the March 21 meeting were park lands. <br />At that meeting, it was pointed out that the highest density and, <br />therefore, demand for parks will arise from the southeast quadrant <br />of the City. Demands for athletic facilities cannot be met under <br />the current situation since only River's Bend and the elementary <br />school offer developed facilities. The proposed park at Windemere, <br />Cedar Hills and Chestnut Hills is sized as a neighborhood park of <br />approximately eight acres. It is anticipated that one softball <br />field and one soccer field may be accommodated at this park. This <br />additional facility will not meet demand. <br /> <br /> <br />