Agenda - Council - 05/22/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CASE ADOPT HORSE ORDINANCE By: Mark S. Banwart, Community Developmen! Director By: Bill Goodrich, City Attorney Background: On February 22, 1989 at a special joint meeting of the City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission and the Park and Recreation Commission, Commissioner Shumway rcviewecl in detail the proposed amendment to the Horse Ordinance that was denied by City co~ncil in 1988. At the City Council meeting of March 14, 1989, City council directe[l staff to provide further information regarding amendments to the current Horse Ordinance to be presented at the March 28, 1989 Council meeting. For your information, attached is the following: A) Proposed Horse Ordinance Observations: During the joint meeting of February. 22, 1989, a number of concerns were stated by the Commissioners and Council present. These included: Commissioner Hetland felt that the manure contxols proposed by the saddle club were more specific and should replace those proposed in the draft ordinance. Some concerns were expressed regarding the enforceability of the ordinance. The City Attorney stated that the horse ordinance would be enforced similar to a nuisance ordinance; for which violation is a misdemeanor. City Attorney Goodrich also stated that courts were not set up to impound horses and that a Horseman's Committee as proposed in the draft ordinance could only be an adviso%, body to the City Council. It was also noted that animal owners are liable for damages caused by their animals and a discussion ensued regarding if current insurance should be something that the City require of horse owners. It was also stated that the Horseman's Committee would be required to maintain minutes pursuant to State Statute for any legally formed entity within the City. Councilmembers DeLuca and Pearson expressed concern with reducing the acreage requirements for keeping horses. The consensus of the Planning and Zoning Commission members present were to make modifications to the proposed horse ordinance before placing it on the City Council agenda for reconsideration. On April 4, 1989, the Planning and Zoning Commission directed Commissioner Ten-y Hendriksen to make a presentation to City Council. On April 25, 1989, the Ramsey City Council heard a presentation of Commissioner Tenry Hen&q_ksen. The Council consensus was that the initial a~eage increment should remain at 3 acres. Councilmember DeLuca was of the opinion that no horses should be allowed on less than 3 acres South of the MWCC bounda.w. Council consensus was to place the horse ordinance review on the May 9 council agenda for fur&er discussion. On May 2, 1989 a: the Ramsey Planning and Zoning Corm~'nission meeting, Corm~'rfissioner Hen&'-/3:sen stated that he made a presentation to City Council regarding the propos~ amenchment ro the horse ordinance. It appears that City Council is receptive to the idea of allowing two horses on 3 acres and scaling ur~ at a rate of one horse per 1/2 ape over 3 acres. Council is also willing to consider aiio~Sng horses on 1.5 to 3 acre parcels with a site plan that has been reviewed.. Comm/ssioner Hendriksen stat~ that he will redraft the ordinance mmendmen: bas~ on the discussion v, Sth City Council, present that re&-afr to the Planning mhd Zoning Com~.'nission at the N.iav 16~ Planning and Zoning Comm. ission meeting, and approach City Council with tine revised mmen&menr a: a later date.