Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br />July 10, 1990 <br /> <br />Mn/DOT concurs with this recommendation, since it would be <br />difficult to prove that the bid is materially unbalanced. Also, <br />the rejection of the low bid could be contested by the bidder, <br />which could result in greater cost and delays in the projects. <br />Mn/DOT also stated that their specifications do not require <br />rejection of bids with unbalanced unit prices but only allow for <br />their rejection. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. <br /> <br />/mlc <br /> <br />Council (5) <br />Dave Hartley, City Administrator <br />Bill Goodrich, city Attorney <br /> <br />File: RA3:01-127 <br /> <br /> <br />