My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1990
>
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 11:01:41 AM
Creation date
12/9/2003 9:15:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/25/1990
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE <br /> <br /> STREET LIGHTING POLICY <br />By: Steve Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The City has been considering the development of a street lighting policy since early, 1989. At the <br />present time, there are few publicl? owned street lights within the City. Some of these lights were <br />installed by homeowners associauons and a couple have been installed at the City's direction as a <br />demonstration project. A detailed policy for street light placement and financing is currently <br />lacking and should be established. <br /> <br />In reviewing the question of street lighting needs, I believe this issue should be separated into two <br />distinct categories; one being lighting needs along major arterial streets and the other subdivision <br />lighting. Each of these categories will be discussed separately. <br /> <br />ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTING <br /> <br />l~.ar,.ligL0.1Jll~ Street lights would be placed at intersections along arterial and collector <br />streets. The chief benefit from this type of lighting is as a navigation aid to motorists and <br />an increased safety at the illuminated intersections. <br /> <br />The City Police Department developed a priority list of intersection locations for street <br />lighting. The highest priority included primarily intersections of arterial streets plus <br />locations of difficult curves or unusual sight limitations. Subsequent priority levels <br />included additional intersections along arterial streets. <br /> <br />potentilal (~osts: The cost of implementing an arterial lighting plan would be as follows: <br /> <br />Installation Annual <br /> Cost 0 & M Co~t <br /> <br />Priority 1 - (17 locations) <br />Priority 1 & 2 - (40 locations) <br />Priority 1, 2 & 3 - (56 locations) <br />All Arterial Intersections <br /> <br />$ 9,550 $ 1,300 <br />$15,150 $ 3,100 <br />$22,450 $ 4,350 <br />$54,550 $10,550 <br /> <br />Basis of Financing: Since the major benefit of arterial street lighting would occur to the <br />general motoring public, it would seem inappropriate to assess costs to be adjacent property <br />owners. The City would therefore need to absorb the installation and operation and <br />maintenance costs. However, new developments could be required to provide street lights <br />along arterial streets when it could be determined that the development would cause need <br />for a street light under the established criteria. <br /> <br />Technical Details: Arterial lighting installations should consist of functional, <br />economical wood or fiberglass standards equipped with the standard cobra head. Drop <br />style luminaries would provide the best light dispersion pattern and be resistant to <br />vandalism in these relatively secluded locations. Problems caused by glare from the drop <br />style luminaire will be minimized by the greater mounting height. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.