My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1990
>
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 11:01:41 AM
Creation date
12/9/2003 9:15:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/25/1990
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Recommendations: Specific light placement justification criteria should be established <br />as a part of the street lighting policy to control costs. Such criteria might include: <br /> a) threshold levels of traffic on side streets <br /> b) marked pedestrian crossing at schools and parks <br /> c) high frequency of night-time accidents; and <br /> d) unusual sight limitations <br /> <br />SUBDIVISION LIGHTING <br /> <br />][}.lr, ligrl}lla~ Street lights would be placed at regular intervals of approximately 200 feet <br />throughout a local subdivision. The major benefits from this type of lighting is increased <br />pedestrian safety, particularly in areas without sidewalks, and increased crime protection. <br />These benefits occur chiefly to residents of the subdivision, who should be involved both <br />in the decision to provide street lighting and the financing of the system. At the present <br />time there are no subdivisions within Ramsey that have full subdivision lighting. <br /> <br />potential Costs: It is difficult to provide an estimate for subdivision lighting since a <br />relatively extensive analysis of the City's subdivisions would need to be made. In <br />addition, past surveys indicate that many residents would oppose subdivision street <br />lighting, and it is quite safe to assume that not ali subdivisions would opt for installing <br />lighting. <br /> <br />However, to give some idea of the magnitude of subdivision street lighting cost, assume <br />the following: (a) 70% of the local street system services subdivisions; and (b) 50% of <br />the subdivisions would opt to have street lights installed; and (c) 100 watt lights are placed <br />approximately 200 feet apart. Then an estimated annual operational cost of approximately <br />$60,000.00 could be anticipated. Installation costs would be highly dependent upon the <br />degree of restoration required. <br /> <br />Basis of Financing: Since subdivision lighting would primarily benefit the subdivision <br />property owners, it is reasonable to require the developer to install the street lighting system <br />or assess the installation costs to the benefitted property owners. The local electric utility <br />company will bill operation and maintenance costs to homeowners associations, but will <br />not bill individual property owners. Therefore, unless the City were to accept annual <br />operation and maintenance costs, existing subdivisions without homeowners associations <br />would be precluded from establishing subdivision street lighting. <br /> <br />Technical Details: Since the cost of the installation of subdivision street lighting would <br />be borne by the developer or property owner, ornamental poles and fixtures could be <br />considered. The number of different fixture styles will be limited as a matter of practicality <br />by the utility company but the developer or homeowner should be allowed to select the <br />desired style. The City should establish some standards regarding lamp wattage, spacing <br />and mounting heights. <br /> <br />General Comments: <br /> <br />Electrical service to Ramsey is provided by Anoka Electric Cooperative. This utility has three rate <br />options which the City may consider. One option is for the utility to provide only the electrical <br />energy for the system which consequently means the City would buy, install and maintain poles, <br />fixtures and luminaries. I would recommend against this option since it would require the City to <br />invest in expensive equipment which would have limited use within the City. I also feel it would <br />be difficult for our Public Works Department to be cost-effective in performing maintenance <br />considering the utility has specialized equipment and personnel who perform these routine tasks on <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.